TRR Suspension Shoot Out

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Stealthf1

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2012
Posts
298
Reaction score
106
Location
Marksville,LA
The only truck that had me and Brandon stop fighting to remove the jacked up lightbar off on the side of the track was yours Jarrett that beast screamed around the track and looked smooth as hell..figured you'd run a setup to where the exhaust smelled like cotton candy or something to match the color.

I just got one run in on the truck but ended up blowing out the rear King 3.0s due to issue with my Rogue bumpstop. Besides that I was really impressed by SVCs setups esp the dual 3.5 fronts, the cantilever trucks were nice to see in person and guage how well they compared in real world testing. But imo I think the bypassed rear trucks running 3.5s took the cake and represented very well in a side by side outlook,compared to the numbers on paper between both setups. Anyways was awesome to see them all perform esp in the ****** terrain.
 
Last edited:

Mjolnir

FRF Addict
Joined
Jan 1, 2012
Posts
2,320
Reaction score
2,424
Location
Colleyville, Texas
I will say there is a huge difference between my new 3.5 setup and the 3.0's of last year. The back of the truck now tracks to the performance of the front, and the truck screamed thru everything, and loved to air it out


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

sandtrooper29

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Posts
389
Reaction score
155
Location
Lubbock, TX
This was my real first test of my ADD front and rear setup. It was awesome. Front setup is ADD newly redesigned 1.5" uniball UCA, spindle, LCA, tie rods and SVC tuned fox DSC.

The rear is their suspension bed cage with 18" fox 3.0. I have 17 5/8" of measures travel. This thing a smooth as a baby's butt.

My truck handled the rough terrain and as far as the marked red/white hazard area there was really no need to slow down. As far a clearing the jumps the rear end landed so smooth. Didn't even hardly feel the rear land.
 

ntm

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Posts
886
Reaction score
946
Location
Alberta, Canada
I think the biggest issue your going to see with this thread is that most people have pretty limited experience with anything other than their own setup, which they will be super pumped about, because everything is better than stock...

Still interesting to hear people's thoughts, it just can't really be used as a comparison.
 
OP
OP
factive

factive

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Posts
344
Reaction score
280
Location
Park City, Ut
You're probably right, @ntm, but I was hoping TRR would give those same people a chance to ride in vendor/other owner trucks that have different more advanced setups. Anyways, I've already pretty much decided on the SVC setup so sounds like I made the right choice.
 

treypal

Lord of the Raptors
Joined
Jun 16, 2011
Posts
4,452
Reaction score
4,042
Location
Riviera TX
The only truck that had me and Brandon stop fighting to remove the jacked up lightbar off on the side of the track was yours Jarrett that beast screamed around the track and looked smooth as hell..figured you'd run a setup to where the exhaust smelled like cotton candy or something to match the color.

I just got one run in on the truck but ended up blowing out the rear King 3.0s due to issue with my Rogue bumpstop. Besides that I was really impressed by SVCs setups esp the dual 3.5 fronts, the cantilever trucks were nice to see in person and guage how well they compared in real world testing. But imo I think the bypassed rear trucks running 3.5s took the cake and represented very well in a side by side outlook,compared to the numbers on paper between both setups. Anyways was awesome to see them all perform esp in the ****** terrain.

Your light rack doesn't make a good yard ornament fyi.
 
Top