debate
Full Access Member
x2
Think you're correct. SVT used spring blocks with shelves stronger than those on an F250. They only had the light duty F150 frame to work with and decided frame and bed tweaks were better than a middle-of-nowhere broken axle.
What SVT, probably, missed was the modular frame failure at the rear/middle connections.
I propose this design was intentional...
Stress point or broke axel and stranded. If this were to become a military vehicle would you rather have a tweak to the box or a broke axel if you were under fire or in a support or rescue mode.
Think you're correct. SVT used spring blocks with shelves stronger than those on an F250. They only had the light duty F150 frame to work with and decided frame and bed tweaks were better than a middle-of-nowhere broken axle.
What SVT, probably, missed was the modular frame failure at the rear/middle connections.