duracell24
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2016
- Posts
- 51
- Reaction score
- 55
Hey guys, long time lurker and first-time poster here. I greatly appreciate all the info and insight that gets passed on here.
Wanted to get everyone's opinion on a decision I've been sitting 50/50 on for a few weeks now. I can't make up my mind whether to pull the trigger on a 2016 King Ranch sitting on my dealers lot (fairly loaded) or order a 2017 Raptor. The King Ranch MSRP is $65,090 and he's willing to sell it to me for $57,090. He would be willing to do a 17 Raptor at MSRP (with my Military discount) which comes out to $65,745 outfitted the way I'd like. Difference then is $8405 (although I think i could get the King Ranch down another 1-2k with some harder negotiation).
The thing is, I know I dont NEED the Raptor. I take a week long elk hunting trip once a year that involves some steep off-road/rock climbing where it would absolutely come in handy. Could the King Ranch do the same trip? Most likely. Outside of that trip, I can really only think of a few other times per year that I'd be off-roading and I'm sure the King Ranch would do just fine with those too. I dont do any Baja like desert racing so I'm not terribly worried about that.
The only reason I started even looking at the Raptor a few weeks ago was when I saw the initial cost wasnt that much higher than the King Ranch. Then I started doing some financial analysis and figured out that if the 2017 Raptor holds value like the older 13/14 Raptors did, it will lose significantly less in depreciation than the King Ranch. Even factoring in decreased mpg (assumed 2 mpg less overall than KR) and increased insurance cost (got a quote), the Raptor would actually be almost $4k cheaper to own in 4-5 years given how much less it would depreciate.
My questions that I'd like folks opinion on....
1) Do you think my 2 mpg estimation is accurate? I know the 16s still have the 6 speed, most I've seen are getting 18mpg with that engine. I assumed 16mpg for the 17 Raptor
2) Do you think the Gen2's will hold value like the Gen 1's have? I know there is concern out there that the potential V8TT in 2018 will kill values.
3) Is anyone really concerned about V6TT reliability? If I swing for the Raptor, I'd plan on keeping it for at least 5 years/75k.
Like most dudes, I'd REALLY like to get the Raptor. However, I acknowledge that I wouldnt be using it to its full capability 98% of the time and it would just be my really sweet daily driver. That makes me lean King Ranch. But, if it would be CHEAPER over the 4-6 year period to have given my rough estimation of resale value (again, assuming that its still selling for $45k ish in 4 years like current Gen 1's are) then it would make more sense to get the Raptor, even if I dont use it like its supposed to be used.
Appreciate any responses for the first-time noob here. Thanks!
Wanted to get everyone's opinion on a decision I've been sitting 50/50 on for a few weeks now. I can't make up my mind whether to pull the trigger on a 2016 King Ranch sitting on my dealers lot (fairly loaded) or order a 2017 Raptor. The King Ranch MSRP is $65,090 and he's willing to sell it to me for $57,090. He would be willing to do a 17 Raptor at MSRP (with my Military discount) which comes out to $65,745 outfitted the way I'd like. Difference then is $8405 (although I think i could get the King Ranch down another 1-2k with some harder negotiation).
The thing is, I know I dont NEED the Raptor. I take a week long elk hunting trip once a year that involves some steep off-road/rock climbing where it would absolutely come in handy. Could the King Ranch do the same trip? Most likely. Outside of that trip, I can really only think of a few other times per year that I'd be off-roading and I'm sure the King Ranch would do just fine with those too. I dont do any Baja like desert racing so I'm not terribly worried about that.
The only reason I started even looking at the Raptor a few weeks ago was when I saw the initial cost wasnt that much higher than the King Ranch. Then I started doing some financial analysis and figured out that if the 2017 Raptor holds value like the older 13/14 Raptors did, it will lose significantly less in depreciation than the King Ranch. Even factoring in decreased mpg (assumed 2 mpg less overall than KR) and increased insurance cost (got a quote), the Raptor would actually be almost $4k cheaper to own in 4-5 years given how much less it would depreciate.
My questions that I'd like folks opinion on....
1) Do you think my 2 mpg estimation is accurate? I know the 16s still have the 6 speed, most I've seen are getting 18mpg with that engine. I assumed 16mpg for the 17 Raptor
2) Do you think the Gen2's will hold value like the Gen 1's have? I know there is concern out there that the potential V8TT in 2018 will kill values.
3) Is anyone really concerned about V6TT reliability? If I swing for the Raptor, I'd plan on keeping it for at least 5 years/75k.
Like most dudes, I'd REALLY like to get the Raptor. However, I acknowledge that I wouldnt be using it to its full capability 98% of the time and it would just be my really sweet daily driver. That makes me lean King Ranch. But, if it would be CHEAPER over the 4-6 year period to have given my rough estimation of resale value (again, assuming that its still selling for $45k ish in 4 years like current Gen 1's are) then it would make more sense to get the Raptor, even if I dont use it like its supposed to be used.
Appreciate any responses for the first-time noob here. Thanks!