where do you come up with this shit?
HOW CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH DIFFERENCE THE TRANSMISSION TUNING PLAYS INTO PERFORMANCE RESULTS?
Take 2 identical cars, 1 manual 1 auto. The auto will dyno lower due to parasitic loss, but will run quicker @ the track all else equal (1/4 mile straight line) than the manual car - even when the driver of the manual has a "perfect" launch.
"come up with this shit?" Never in my adult life modding vehicles have I ever encountered an ownership group/forum where members can be so super technical knowledgable while also having so many clueless people at the same time, never in my life have I ever considered/heard/paid any attention to a "tuner" that doesn't tune the transmission on an auto vehicle. I know that isn't the case w/ 5 star - my point simply being that seems like there are more similarities in the ECM tuning strategy across multiple tuners but theres a large disparity when it comces to the TCM tuning - Cobb obviously comes to mind weren't even selling TCM tuning until just recently. I don't need any test to know what the results would be if you put a Cobb ECM tuned only truck vs. a truck running pretty much ANY ECM tune + TCM tuning included would be.
So my guess is that there are some differences between both companies when it comes to their tranny tuning & - all else being equal it seems - that could account for the differences in performance results.
There's numerous other things that could come into play too of course, but coming from vehicles where transmission tuning made a HUGE difference in performance & seeing that TCM tuning seemed somewhat of an afterthought for the Raptor modding community until more recently (again - simply FLOORED anyone would've paid $100s for any tune that didn't touch the tranny- astonished really) & my guess is that could be a reason.....& it could be a good reason, these trucks make ALOT of TQ, especially after ECM tuning/boost increase - may be that having a more conservative tranny tuning approach is a better bet for long term reliability even if it equates to less than optimal 1/4 mile performance.