Can the stock motor support a supercharger

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

FordTechOne

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Posts
6,639
Reaction score
13,003
Location
Detroit
No. The service Short Block from Ford is the same as the original; it’s not designed for positive displacement. If it’s your weekend toy and you have money to replace the engine again, that’s one thing, but it’s certainly not an ideal scenario. Especially if the engine comes apart and debris is ingested into the supercharger; then you’re out both.

The bottom line is the 6.2 doesn’t breath well N/A and F/I certainly doesn’t make that any better. You’re trying to force air through a 2V engine that existed only to serve as a base gas engine to supersede the 5.4. So everything from the pistons to the cylinder head design to the rods, crank, and cooling system are only designed to for atmospheric pressure at the most, not a positive air charge.

As others have mentioned, the oil pump is the first weakest point, as it’s not designed to handle the load the S/C drive puts on the crank. When they fail it’s a total engine loss, so that’s a bare minimum upgrade.

The pistons and rods are the next failure point, same scenario as above. The cylinder pressures from F/I are immense, especially at low RPM, which can result in connecting rod failure. The piston ringlands are are susceptible to cracking/failure and cylinder wall damage due to excessive heat buildup, detonation, and pre-ignition. Hence why the Livernois long block uses forged pistons with thicker ringlands.

With the Livernois long block being $20k, the S/C kit being $10k, and then a few grand in labor and tuning, you’ll never recover that investment. And then your next weakest point becomes the transmission, t-case, and axles. Putting down the power that the livernois engine is theoretically capable of is simply not going to happen with the stock driveline or suspension, especially since you’re limited to 2WD with their being no full time 4WD mode.

People will tell you the original engine is “fine” and not to worry about it, but they’re not the ones footing the bill when it fails. And last we’ve heard, long blocks are no longer available from Ford.
 

EricM

FRF Addict
Joined
May 11, 2016
Posts
3,420
Reaction score
2,952
Location
OHIO
"doesn't breathe well" What a load of shit.

6.2L V8 was the most powerful N/A V8 Ford ever produced when it was introduced. How do you make power N/A? Airflow.

He is a 3.5L V6 nut swinger til the day he dies- so keep that in mind with anything he posts.
 

New recaros

FRF Addict
Joined
May 23, 2019
Posts
2,857
Reaction score
4,479
Location
Colorado
As FT1 mentioned, the cooling system is often overlooked. Theoretically, if you add 50% HP then you will need to increase cooling capacity at least 50% to be able to use that HP in the same manner. You might get by with a short drag race, but that’s it.
I am not saying it won’t work, I am saying if you’re going to use that added HP, cooling upgrades are a must.
 

FordTechOne

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Posts
6,639
Reaction score
13,003
Location
Detroit
"doesn't breathe well" What a load of shit.

6.2L V8 was the most powerful V8 Ford ever produced when it was introduced. How do you make power N/A? Airflow.

He is a 3.5L V6 nut swinger til the day he dies- so keep that in mind with anything he posts.
No, OP needs to keep in mind that Gen 1 fanboys like yourself mislead people based on your biased and tainted views. Slapping an S/C on an N/A engine is a recipe for failure.

If you think a 6.2 breathes well you’re a lost cause. It’s a 2V SOHC engine, it was never designed with performance in mind. It’s a workhorse truck engine, hence why it doesn’t get real gains from bolt-ons; the limitation is the engine design.

Maybe you should spend some time reading the heads/cam “upgrades” on here where people wasted thousands and ended up losing power and driveability. There is a reason there is almost non-existent aftermarket support for these engines, they were never intended for performance from inception.
 
Last edited:

Gumby

FRF Addict
Joined
Mar 7, 2023
Posts
1,847
Reaction score
3,527
Location
Nashville
This is where FT one and I go our separate ways. I/he can't really say if it will support a supercharger. It will bolt on. yes. You haven't given any info what your intention are for HP. What are you using the truck for. daly driver for you/grandmother? Once a month? Going to street race on the weekends? looking to get in the 10s? looking to tow a 10,000 lb camper? Wanting to run the Baja?
As a general daly driver 5-10 lbs of boost on your way to get milk and eggs. You will be fine. The supercharger should have its own cooler.
Now the other end. Big truck in the 10s .We now know how you intend to use the truck. and FT one didn't recommend enough.
There are a ton of OG 6.2 with superchargers on them. Most are scenario one.
You build a scenario one truck and drive it like it's a scenario two truck FT one is exactly right. But still didn't recommend enough stuff to keep it together. And the frequency of going back through it.
Big shout out To DCI Motorsports KING of head flow. Pontiac.
@FordTechOne do you know the flow # on a 3.5 Per cylinder? or entire head? You got me curious. True CFM@28/H2o or gravity. (that might be proprietary info to have) Either one will work. I am sure it is out there somewhere for both.3.5 and 6.2
 
Last edited:

Gumby

FRF Addict
Joined
Mar 7, 2023
Posts
1,847
Reaction score
3,527
Location
Nashville
@FordTechOne Never mind think I found it.
3.5 Eco-boost
@.450 is 257/198
@.550 262/191

Not as good as I thought it would be . With your claims, LOL But pretty impressive for a stock head.
I am having trouble finding 6.2 I will keep digging I know the SVT heads are different than reg 6.2. correct?
Ok I found it.
6.2
@.450 is 278/177
@.550 is 305/191
There's your numbers. Not to shabby for not breathing well. Again not what I thought they would be. I thought they would both be low 300s/low200s
 
Last edited:

New recaros

FRF Addict
Joined
May 23, 2019
Posts
2,857
Reaction score
4,479
Location
Colorado
@FordTechOne Never mind think I found it.
3.5 Eco-boost
@.450 is 257/198
@.550 262/191

Not as good as I thought it would be . With your claims, LOL But pretty impressive for a stock head.
I am having trouble finding 6.2 I will keep digging I know the SVT heads are different than reg 6.2. correct?
Ok I found it.
6.2
@.450 is 278/177
@.550 is 305/191
There's your numbers. Not to shabby for not breathing well. Again not what I thought they would be. I thought they would both be low 300s/low200s
Considering the 6.2 is about 45% more displacement, one would think the 6.2 heads would flow more as compared to the 3.5 heads.
 
Top