379 cubic inches badges

[BDRAG]

but yes i would be interested in the badges I like cc not liters

You mean Ci's? You really want a 6200 CC badge? HAhaaa. I will if you will!

BDRAG

 

[tbone]

hahaha ya ci's but cc's would be an interesting badge on a truck

 

[Cleave]

Lol, I used real engine specs to find out the displacement, not the online conversion website, a while back I had the exact bore and stroke measurements and it came out to between 379.3 and 379.5 cubic inches if I remember correctly, unlike Chevy, ford doesn't over rate their engine displacement by .05 liters

 

[Cleave]

That looks pretty damn good to me

by the way THIS is the 7.0L I was talking about, it's a bored and stroked raptor engine making 700 hp N/A on pump gas that ran 8.73 in that configuration

 

[BDRAG]

Cleave, Just so you Know, I have been a Ford fan since 1965, Our first Ford. A light metallic blue Country Squire Wagon with a 240 6 banger. No wood grain! HAhaaaa. One of my favorite cars as a youn man was our 72 Pinto 3 door. It would SMOKe most v 8's, yes the 350's and all the imports of the time. Even beat a Maverick Grabber with a 351 Twice in 3 minutes. HAhaaaa. German 2.0. Canadian Built, Cost $1.00 a lb. $2100 new. HAhaaaaa.

BDRAG

 

[KBR]

I vote for Boss 379.

 

[bstoner59]

I vote for a "2.5>2.0" badge on my bed.

 

[Sliver Raptor]

I vote for a "2.5>2.0" badge on my bed.

Here we go!

 

[Cleave]

I just don't like the 350 cause a cheap engine with cheap mods that make cheap power does not make a great or even good engine, the 6.2L in our truck is just as advanced performance wise as the original 5.4L that came out in the F-150 back in the 90s, look at what that engine is doing now, it's the most powerful production V8 on the planet, the 6.2L has even more potential than the 5.4L did

 

[blockdoc]

My dad's '69 mustang with a 390 is pretty stout. Smoked plenty of 350's in its day.