Trade gen 2 for gen 1??

[FordTechOne]

You really didn't find any evidence?

Evidence of what? A cam phaser issue affecting certain earlier models that is being corrected under warranty for free? Clearly you have a vendetta against the 3.5 Ecoboost, and as someone who services these engines on a regular basis I wonder why the animosity.

 

[Truckasaurus]

Evidence of what? A cam phaser issue affecting certain earlier models that is being corrected under warranty for free? Clearly you have a vendetta against the 3.5 Ecoboost, and as someone who services these engines on a regular basis I wonder why the animosity.

Wow. That's quite a leap!

Simple observation of available evidence does not equal animosity

Vendetta is also an interesting choice of words. Perhaps you are projecting

 

[isis]

Wow. That's quite a leap!

Simple observation of available evidence does not equal animosity

Vendetta is also an interesting choice of words. Perhaps you are projecting

Hearsay isn’t evidence. A handful of problems in the numbers that these things sell isn’t an epidemic.

Do you know how many subaru guys used to say Mobil 1 caused engine failure? That doesn’t make it true.

 

[Truckasaurus]

Hearsay isn’t evidence. A handful of problems in the numbers that these things sell isn’t an epidemic.

Do you know how many subaru guys used to say Mobil 1 caused engine failure? That doesn’t make it true.

Subaru guys is a bit of an oxymoron, no?

And all these engines getting replaced aren't happening. Check.

(*cough vendetta *cough)

 

[FordTechOne]

Wow. That's quite a leap!

Simple observation of available evidence does not equal animosity

Vendetta is also an interesting choice of words. Perhaps you are projecting

Clearly your definition of "evidence" varies from the norm. Evidence constitutes a confirmed failure and associated repair. Not a customer concern that may or may not be a valid issue. In other words, a customer concern does not equal "evidence".

I surmised that you have a vendetta based on your posts throughout this thread. Clearly, you want to convince everyone to believe the 6.2 is the only "reliable" option. Why, I don't know.

No projecting here. The 6.2 is a very well designed, reliable, and serviceable engine. The 3.5 is no different; it simply varies in the configuration in which is produces its output. Having serviced both engines and being a Ford Senior Master Technician, I am concerned with your perceived negativity toward the 3.5 based on nothing more than internet forum posts.

 

[RS4]

Funny, I spent a little time on Google, researching how to make my Gen 2 more like a Gen 1. Sadly, there were zero results.

Lol. Alright guys, I now understand you are both FU rich. OP, I hope you have DEEP pockets. Carry on.

No disrespect but i have a patient that was laura and no is robin and i immediately thought of Gen 2 guys

bash away and no **** and I’m lover not a fighter

 

[RS4]

No disrespect but i have a patient that was laura and no is robin and i immediately thought of Gen 2 guys

bash away and no **** and I’m lover not a fighter

“Not like there is anything wrong with it” as the great Seinfeld said

I’m just joking...Laugh a little

 

[GCATX]

No disrespect but i have a patient that was laura and no is robin and i immediately thought of Gen 2 guys

bash away and no **** and I’m lover not a fighter

Got Dayum! Pass me some of what you're smoking, please! I will say it seems like the Gen 1 guys have the best weed. :^)

 

[isis]

Subaru guys is a bit of an oxymoron, no?

And all these engines getting replaced aren't happening. Check.

(*cough vendetta *cough)

Touche on the Subaru thing.

all what engines? The 30-40 that needed warranty work but didn’t fail? Out of how many million?

 

[Truckasaurus]

Clearly your definition of "evidence" varies from the norm. Evidence constitutes a confirmed failure and associated repair. Not a customer concern that may or may not be a valid issue. In other words, a customer concern does not equal "evidence".

I surmised that you have a vendetta based on your posts throughout this thread. Clearly, you want to convince everyone to believe the 6.2 is the only "reliable" option. Why, I don't know.

No projecting here. The 6.2 is a very well designed, reliable, and serviceable engine. The 3.5 is no different; it simply varies in the configuration in which is produces its output. Having serviced both engines and being a Ford Senior Master Technician, I am concerned with your perceived negativity toward the 3.5 based on nothing more than internet forum posts.

Interesting post. Is "surmising" considered to be evidence based? Because you have "surmised" many things incorrectly

In other words, reality "does not verify" your complaints

See what I did there?

Side note: if the 3.5 is so serviceable and reliable and since it makes more low end torque (*cough marketing nonsense*) and gets better fuel mileage than the 6.2, then why isn't it in the SD?