Droop travel is important because it keeps the tires in contact with the ground better. Why is that important? Cause you may want to turn AND go over a bumps at the same time. It also prevents the vehicle from riding like crap, because you would have to increase the spring rates to ride higher (all other things being equal).
So if you like the ride, and you like not rolling over on corners, you LOVE droop travel on your suspension.
There is nothing wrong with the bump stops. Some people have recommended simple changes to the suspension geometry to improve travel especially in the rear. You think that we are catching stuff that Ford missed? (those darn SVT engineers ought to be out on the street). My guess is that it is designed specifically so that the full range of the $700 shocks (each) is effectively used.
In vehicle design, especially in suspension design, you have to make a lot of compromises. Ride, cost, stability, weight carrying capacity, handling, NVH, and "feel" are all important parameters.
This is not a "defect". Some folks, hitting a 12" bump at 60MPH found a weakspot, that didn't disable his vehicle, wreck the drivetrain, or bottom out and destroy $1,400 in rear shocks.
They uh, drove too fast over a big bump. For there not to have been damage, the suspension would have to have effectively transferred a load of over 120,000 pounds of force to the frame over the range of travel (calculations are found in another thread), or had sufficient vertical travel.
The total fix is NOT some chunks of 1/8" steel plate. The only real fix is a TON more travel front and rear, which will cost a LOT of money, and screw up things like ride, cargo capacity, stability, handling, and towing capacity.
Or you can you know, slow down over unfamiliar terrain, and learn how to use your vehicle without breaking it.