BAJASVT
FRF Addict
If you got the money and its not hurting anything. Why not do it. Better off road ability. A lot more travel then a stock raptor. Using a full size truck as a raptor to 4 link is just badass. Caging is obviously safer. Are you new to the dirt world?
No, I'm not new; I don't live on the west side of the country, but I'm familliar with the desert arena of motorsports.
If they were just adding a cage and a 4-link, then yeah a Raptor is a perfect candidate. I'm asking this because it appears that this truck is getting quite a bit more than a cage and a linked rear... why else would the front suspension be removed. It just seems that the end product would be the same and a lot of money could have been saved if the original truck was a more base model, like an XLT, instead of a Raptor.
No offense to RPG as I really like their products and look forward to buying some in the future, but I feel that even a RPG front suspension with every bolt-on part in their arsenal would be the weak link when compared to a properly linked rear suspension.
MagicMtnDan said:Here's an analogy that might help:
4 linking a Raptor is like removing iron sights from an assault rifle and replacing them with a scope.
I get your point and understand that this is an upgrade. My original question would be more along the lines of, "Why would you buy an assault rifle and pay extra for iron sights if you knew you were going to replace them with a scope? " Not to mention that you could very quickly and easily remove the scope and go back to iron sights... I think it's safe to say that this truck will never have an OEM rear frame ever again.