... you claimed my argument was about defunding the police? Where did I mention that at all? Please do explain it to me, slowly.
Now I'm sorry I offered. But an offer is an offer. So let's get started. In response to your remark showing zero respect and zero support for the police, I said:
Yeah, let's finish what the defunding movement started.
Attitudes like yours, when encountered often, discourage good cops. The bullies and the guys who are hoping for a fight, not so much. The defund the police movement has caused a lot of good cops to say "F*** this, I'm out of here." I'm saying that attitudes like yours and the defund the police movement tend to have the same effect. Nowhere did I claim anything about what you said or thought about the movement. If this isn't clear to you now, I'm not willing to explain it to you again, at any speed.
Let’s not pretend your use of the word “brilliant” was anything less than sarcasm and the fact you would claim it as anything less would be nothing but disingenuous.
OK. I thought that calling you a cold-hearted ingrate would be rude when a reasonable alternative was that you were dumb as a box of rocks. So I didn't. Now that you've demonstrated the ability to recognize sarcasm and use a dictionary, you're at least at the third-grade level and I won't call you a ********, a *******, or a moron. Happy now?