Compacted graphite iron. Same material the new diesel engine blocks are built with.CGI? computer generated imagery?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Compacted graphite iron. Same material the new diesel engine blocks are built with.CGI? computer generated imagery?
Compacted graphite iron. Same material the new diesel engine blocks are built with.
I searched and found the c*nt gap index: The size of the gap between a girls thighs when she is standing with her feet together. ie. 1 finger width or 2 finger width etc.CGI? computer generated imagery?
learn something new every day!Compacted graphite iron. Same material the new diesel engine blocks are built with.
Nice write up! Thanks for sharing. When you removed the lower pan, did you need to pry it off or did it drop down easily once the bolts were removed? If it came off easily, that means the RTV never adhered to the upper pan, and was most likely the leak source. If the lower pan was adhered to the upper pan, it’s entirely possible that the upper pan was the source of the leak. Did you replace the transmission lines and modify the harness routing per the TSB? If not, I can send you the instructions if you’d like.I kind of wonder if it was the block stiffener leaking, so the 2 times they just replaced the plastic pan, they actually weren't fixing the leak....
80k miles on the truck now, hope to make it to 150k before I buy an electric truck.
Nice write up! Thanks for sharing. When you removed the lower pan, did you need to pry it off or did it drop down easily once the bolts were removed? If it came off easily, that means the RTV never adhered to the upper pan, and was most likely the leak source. If the lower pan was adhered to the upper pan, it’s entirely possible that the upper pan was the source of the leak. Did you replace the transmission lines and modify the harness routing per the TSB? If not, I can send you the instructions if you’d like.
Do you need to troll every Gen 2 with your garbage? You’re a know nothing hack, stop spreading misinformation. Gen 2 3.5 isn’t a cyclone, it was a clean sheet design for 2017. There is nothing weak about the design; hence why it’s used in the 640HP GT. The only reason the upper end of the 2.7 is CGI is due to it’s relative output compared to its physical size and usage case. Hence the name “Nano” for that engine family. The 400HP 3.0 Nano is all aluminum, so once again your nonsense is debunked.The stiffener is for the block, not the pan. Keeps the bottom end of the block and the mains from moving around.
It's a weak block compared to newer stuff. The Cyclone engine family is getting a bit long in the tooth. The block design used in the 3.5L EB engine would never be used in a clean sheet design today. Go look at a 2.7L EB V6 for comparison. That was Ford's 100% clean sheet EB V6 design from 2015. All the highly stressed areas are made from CGI.
I have one of the first Gen 2.7s- it's fine. It doesn't make any weird ticking noises or rattles, and it doesn't leak at all. I don't love it necessarily, but I don't think it's going to be problematic in any way either.which might be why everyone loves the 2.7 liter motor however the 3 liter diesel (which is no longer offered) is a vastly superior motor having proved itself with Land Rover for years.
I do not get the love for the 2.7 liter motor