Motor oil on top of intake manifold

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

onthebrake

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Posts
406
Reaction score
191
Location
Fountain Valley, CA
You need to find the source of the leak. If it turns out that it's blow by from the PCV then a catch can may help. DO NOT get a JLT can. They are not sufficient for a turbocharged engine. You need a dual valve can...not a dual can system...although those are fine...A dual valve system like UPR will catch oil vapor when under boost where the JLT will not.
Yep. I agree. I have the UPR catch can on my '17.
 

lottp

Full Access Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Posts
178
Reaction score
75
Same...UPR and catching tons of chocolate milk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Badgertits

FRF Addict
Joined
Jan 24, 2019
Posts
2,809
Reaction score
2,446
Location
Ma
I was against the catch can craze but begrudgingly changed sides after tech @ Ford dealer told me he had torn down the previous gen EB motors w/ 80k on them & would be all coked up w/ carbon deposits. Now- admittedly he had not seen any new EB motors come in yet to get a look inside after some mileage since they added port injection, but he convinced me enough to get the fuel system cleaning service done @ 21k miles & I have a JLT catch can I’m about to install this weekend.

My dealer actually recommended adding one, but specifically said “do not get a double sided one or anything that’s going to require cutting/drilling/modifying existing factory parts or it could effect warranty” the JLT does not require any of that, true “bolt on”
 

Booth9999

Professional basket weaver level 7
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Posts
1,968
Reaction score
920
Location
Idyllwild
It is the valve covers I’m sure. It wasn’t leaking from the PVC valve it just disappears inside. My leak was just the covers them self (2x).
 

pbtjrlmrt

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2019
Posts
560
Reaction score
457
Location
Oregon
I was against the catch can craze but begrudgingly changed sides after tech @ Ford dealer told me he had torn down the previous gen EB motors w/ 80k on them & would be all coked up w/ carbon deposits. Now- admittedly he had not seen any new EB motors come in yet to get a look inside after some mileage since they added port injection, but he convinced me enough to get the fuel system cleaning service done @ 21k miles & I have a JLT catch can I’m about to install this weekend.

My dealer actually recommended adding one, but specifically said “do not get a double sided one or anything that’s going to require cutting/drilling/modifying existing factory parts or it could effect warranty” the JLT does not require any of that, true “bolt on”

The warranty can not be voided. Federal law requires manufacturers to honor ALL warranty claims unless they can PROVE that a specific claim is directly related to a modification. And then only that specific claim can be denied. JLT does not catch vapor while under boodt. You have a boosted engine therefore you will only be catchning oil very rarely. Better than nothing I guess...barely... but why not do it right.
 

Donmatteo

FRF Addict
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Posts
1,543
Reaction score
1,544
Location
Santa Clarita / Coronado
The warranty can not be voided. Federal law requires manufacturers to honor ALL warranty claims unless they can PROVE that a specific claim is directly related to a modification. And then only that specific claim can be denied. JLT does not catch vapor while under boodt. You have a boosted engine therefore you will only be catchning oil very rarely. Better than nothing I guess...barely... but why not do it right.

that’s not 100% accurate.

Catch cans are illegal (yes, illegal) in California per CARB laws and is enough justification to not honor a warranty claim, at least in CA.
 

pbtjrlmrt

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2019
Posts
560
Reaction score
457
Location
Oregon
that’s not 100% accurate.

Catch cans are illegal (yes, illegal) in California per CARB laws and is enough justification to not honor a warranty claim, at least in CA.

Please read the law before mis staing facts. California law DOES NOT supersede federal law. The state may not allow it and may actually be able to make you remove it but it DOES NOT mean they can void your warranty. Again, THe dealer/Ford must PROVE that the modification you made caused the failure and only a failure DIRECTLY related to that modification can be denied.

This should get you started....Know your rights!!:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson–Moss_Warranty_Act
 

Donmatteo

FRF Addict
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Posts
1,543
Reaction score
1,544
Location
Santa Clarita / Coronado
Please read the law before mis staing facts. California law DOES NOT supersede federal law. The state may not allow it and may actually be able to make you remove it but it DOES NOT mean they can void your warranty. Again, THe dealer/Ford must PROVE that the modification you made caused the failure and only a failure DIRECTLY related to that modification can be denied.

This should get you started....Know your rights!!:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson–Moss_Warranty_Act
Ok sparky. Guess you’ve never litigated or been involved in litigation with the Magnuson-Moss act.
 

pbtjrlmrt

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2019
Posts
560
Reaction score
457
Location
Oregon
Ok sparky. Guess you’ve never litigated or been involved in litigation with the Magnuson-Moss act.

Well bright star...actually I spent 2 years WINNING just such a case. It wasn't about having a catch can...wheels in this case. And yeah, it's a real thing and you are wrong about the CARB requirements voiding a vehicle warranty. The federal law applies and supersedes state law. As I mentioned, California can fine you and make you remove the catch can but the manufacturer MUST honor their warranty UNLESS they can PROVE your modification caused the specific failure and then they can only deny that specific claim. The warranty remains in effect for all other claims.
 
Top