We did this back when the 6.2L Raptor first came out
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f24/more-team-jdm-airaid-intake-testing-1346/
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f24/more-team-jdm-airaid-intake-testing-1346/
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
We did this back when the 6.2L Raptor first came out
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f24/more-team-jdm-airaid-intake-testing-1346/
We did this back when the 6.2L Raptor first came out
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f24/more-team-jdm-airaid-intake-testing-1346/
I hate to ask for dyno proof..... But I gotta, just friendly like. This all occurred while I was shopping for an intake, so I followed pretty close.
I don't recall any statement or test claiming any gains at lower rpm from the modified (102) vs the 77 intake.
Did you test the modified vs the unmodified?
Am I mistaken about the airflow measurement being adversely affected at lower rpm with the modified tube? (It's ok, I can handle being wrong. Don't fear tell inning me so)
6.2 - Power To Do More
Airaid CAIs use a very large filter and are notorious for dismounting during harsh driving conditions offroad and this is even more likely with this mod as the collar has been weakened. However there is a simple solution for this by using something to wedge the far end of the filter to keep it from bouncing.
I have considered wedging a chunk of closed cell foam between the end of the filter and the inside of the air box. I think that would do it.
I just noticed the pictures weren't loading in that old thread but here are some dyno graphs from the first test we ran.
The truck was a 2010 mods included a custom tune, Kooks Headers with cats, and magnaflow catback. It made 376 RWHP with the stock air box and 388 RWHP after we installed the modified 102mm Airaid intake.
![]()
One thing to take note of the stock airbox is 80mm, the Airaid is 77mm. This is going to create a difference in the airflow reading from the MAF sensor and will cause the PCM to add more fuel correcting for any increase in air flow. That is why there is "No tune required" (for a stock truck) however when we bolted it on this truck that was already tuned with Full exhaust it lost 7 RWHP HP and had an obvious rich condition with the AF ratio at WOT. So this "no tune required" air kit does require some tuning if you want to benefit your power.
![]()
When we first reported these findings in that original post Airaid contacted us less than happy that we modified their tube and reported a power loss from the air kit. We simply reminded them these are real world tests and modifications the general public is going to do on their own and we want to have tunes that will support it.
This is what we gained from just a Tune on a test truck back in 2010
![]()
Here is what we gained (different truck) with a Tune and the modified Airaid intake together, there is a consistent positive gain with the Modified Airaid intake.
![]()
Thankyou. Guess I talked to the wrong guy. Do you still use or recommend this mod to the Airaid tube?