Old-Raptor-guy
FRF Addict
I understand the engineering. And believe it or not the bean counters have a lot more input than you would think, maybe more than engineering in most cases. I will give you some examples I know of.Well, this is a theory or one of the conspiracy theories... but wouldn't you like to understand the real engineering theory behind this decision to change the gearbox oil at 150K miles?
Back in 80's, the manual transmission fluids and transfer case fluids were changed from 90wt gear oil to ATF. Now to be clear these were new transmission and transfercase designs and I AM NOT saying the old gear lube gear cases can or should use ATF.
The new designs were definitely made for lighter oils. But not quite as light as the manufacturers wanted/needed to help meet government MPG requirements (pesky government again).
The two cases I know of specifically are the following.
The ZF 5 speed (later became 6 speed) in the F250 and F350 was designed for 5w-30 engine oil, as were the New Process transfer cases.
Ford asked both companies to evaluate the use of ATF.
ZF came back and said it would work but would drop the average life of the transmission by about 45,000 miles.
New Process came back and said average life of the T-case would drop about 50,000 miles.
This put both into the 160,000 mile life expectation and was deemed good enough by FOMOCO (don't blame FOMOCO, every manufacturer did it).
Guess what fluids have been in my ZF6 speed and Transfer case for the last 20 years.
If you think any manufacturer cares about you indefinitely you are nuts.
Next case, unrelated to fluids.
In taking with on of the main engineers for international on the 6.0 powerstroke. Engineering wanted a fuel pressure sensor in the system.
The bean counters said NO, that it would add $200 to the cost of each engine and that other manufacturers didn't need one so international didn't need one either.
The Garrett turbo on the 6.0 was originally designed with a VGT position sensor, international deleted it so save money.
Years later it was estimated that the inclusion of those two sensors could have saved international and Ford almost 100 million dollars in warranty repairs.
The duramax uses the same Garrett turbo charger VGT system and it DOES have the position sensor. Story is Garrett easily sold GM on the system by showing all the issues international was having without it.
You gotta be pretty naive if you think the manufacturer (of anything) has your best interests at heart. Cigarette companies should have proven that decades ago.
Last edited: