Ecoboost vs 6.2 raptor

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Lumber

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Posts
41
Reaction score
54
I find it hard to swallow that you lost that much.......

Well Youre not going to see 22 mpg unless youre at 55 on the highway and with a tailwind...

So with country road /stop and go driving yielding a realistic 17 mpg in stock form, I dont have a hard time believing with 35s and the engine on boost alot of the time, the eco will settle at 12-13 mpg, espeially when you throw in some towing and brisk acceleration...

My point is that while the eco may be awesome on a stock truck, introduce some variables and the difference between a green eco engine and a gas -guzzling 6.2 is negligible...
 

snopro99

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Posts
3
Reaction score
0
Location
High Mountains Co
The first thing I did was re-calibrate for the tire difference, ford tech did it in minutes, they have a 35 inch tire to choose from...It was nice to not have to get a programmer like back in the day...

I had the truck for 500 miles maybe before the lift/tires i was seeing 17-18, but the motor has to break in, so im sure that would have gone up.

There is no need to re-gear, like i had thought I might have to, the truck has tons of power, and its basically like a 3.55 now...

My dealer cant believe Im only getting 12-13 mpg either, but i am...

I haul a 2 place jet ski trailer 5 days a week for 5 miles a day...other than that the truck is a creampuff...I drive normal, I dont drive it like a race car. and my mpg history is 12.4 after 3500 miles.

And I run 93 premium...

That is quite sad ...... My 11 Superduty that is 8months old has a average of 16.5 and that is from day one with all the idling and towing. I tow a 21' wake board boat two to three times a week and have gone on several trips with the camper. I quess the moral to the story is that if you tow with a half ton you are going to loose. Funny thing is you probably can not even tell the skis are on the back and would think they would not hurt it much at all.
 

crashmc302

Full Access Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
248
Reaction score
41
Location
Idaho
I can get 18.7 avg (18.8 miles actual at one gallon consumed) rollin' at 45-55 w minimal braking and accelerating. Then hit a 70 mph zone and get 15.2 avg w 15.2 actual miles at one gallon consumed. That's w a tune and CAI. I had actually done much more in depth testing throughout the life of my truck and have new numbers after each mod. But in all reality, if ur lookin at mixed highway and city for a full tank, u won't get much better than 14.8 w all the mods (minus exhaust cuz I haven't put it on yet). That's the average of the averages haha

Those were all recorded on the trip meters but the regular avg counter says 13.8. That's the ENTIRE life of the truck to include the 2 mpg I received it w from the factory haha
 
Last edited:

CineSLR

Roaming Shutterbug
Joined
Mar 17, 2011
Posts
1,547
Reaction score
455
Location
New Orleans, LA
These guys managed 32.2mpg on the highway in a 2wd EB Screw... I'm sure they were driving slow, but it just goes to show you that its all in your right foot.

EcoBoost: Fuel Economy Adventure Challenge

header_winner.png
 

Lumber

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Posts
41
Reaction score
54
I can get 18.7 avg (18.8 miles actual at one gallon consumed) rollin' at 45-55 w minimal braking and accelerating. Then hit a 70 mph zone and get 15.2 avg w 15.2 actual miles at one gallon consumed. That's w a tune and CAI. I had actually done much more in depth testing throughout the life of my truck and have new numbers after each mod. But in all reality, if ur lookin at mixed highway and city for a full tank, u won't get much better than 14.8 w all the mods (minus exhaust cuz I haven't put it on yet). That's the average of the averages haha

What size tires/ rearend?
 

gcmj45acp

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Posts
157
Reaction score
44
The first thing I did was re-calibrate for the tire difference, ford tech did it in minutes, they have a 35 inch tire to choose from...It was nice to not have to get a programmer like back in the day...

I had the truck for 500 miles maybe before the lift/tires i was seeing 17-18, but the motor has to break in, so im sure that would have gone up.

There is no need to re-gear, like i had thought I might have to, the truck has tons of power, and its basically like a 3.55 now...

My dealer cant believe Im only getting 12-13 mpg either, but i am...

I haul a 2 place jet ski trailer 5 days a week for 5 miles a day...other than that the truck is a creampuff...I drive normal, I dont drive it like a race car. and my mpg history is 12.4 after 3500 miles.

And I run 93 premium...
Actually, that's all quite believable to me. And I could be wrong but, I suspect the drag induced by the lift-kit itself, depending on how the lift was accomplished, combined with the extra weight and size of your tires, are all contributing to fuel economy that isn't all that different from a Raptor. The Ecoboost is only going to return the high numbers you had in the beginning on a stock truck. While you obviously didn't build a wide-body Raptor, it sounds like you added quite a bit of load to the truck.

Here's what I'm thinking...A Raptor sits only a couple inches higher than a stock F-150 4x4 and is rolling 4.10 gears instead of 3.73s found on most of the FX4 and other 4wd f-150s. One inch of that "lift" is the tires alone. The other inch is a slightly higher ride height from the springs and geometry of the front control arms as well as the springs out back. The front skid plate provides some protection but, it also was designed to fit flush with the bumper and direct a healthy amount of air around what would otherwise be a drag inducing crossmember up front.

Conversely, my understanding of the Rancho 4-inch kit is that it bolts in using the stock lower control arm mounts. I've seen this kit and to me, it seems a lotlike hanging the landing gear out from under a plane...It creates a lot of drag that just burns even more fuel at highway speeds. Depending on the width, height, and weight of your wheels, combined with the lift and final drive ratio, it seems to me you could readily create enough extra load on the powertrain that you might as well be hauling a payload of 1000lbs or more in the truck. At least that's what I'm thinking. The fact you're getting 6.2L Raptor mileage would almost seem to support my theory.
 

Lumber

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Posts
41
Reaction score
54
Agree, the ecoboost works well in stock form...change up a few of the components and its a different story

Which is why its a no brainer to buy a raptor over a standard 150 that youre going to lift...its the same money, and I think you have a much better truck in the end...
 
Top