Anyone else notice significant fuel economy improvement after break in?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

rtmozingo

FRF Addict
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Posts
1,142
Reaction score
748
Location
North Texas
I got maybe (at max) a 1mpg bump. But I also started getting on the truck after that, so my overall average kind of went down some. Holding steady at 18mpg for 21k now. My best instances (road trips) balance out my offroad runs (or sport mode shenanigans).

23 mpg.jpg

5.7.jpg
 

tooth

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Posts
68
Reaction score
38
Ok, now I have to check when I get in my truck tonight. I haven't looked at mpg in a while, but I make significant'y fewer fill ups than I did with my 2014 denali, but that had the 6.2L. I drive both like a jerk, so I'm surprised I'm not filling up more. :)
 

Keller Steeler

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Posts
199
Reaction score
156
Location
Keller, TX
I’m hoping for an increase in MPG and power after break in. Quite honestly I’m disappointed so far and am regretting getting rid of my gen1.
Did you get an 18 or 19? I am loving my 19 coming from a stock 14. I know not everyone has been happy going Gen 1 to Gen 2. Was your Gen 1 heavily modded? Just curious why you are regretting so far.

Hope it gets better for you. My only real adjustment was to the sound and now It is fine. I like technology and new things so it has plenty of new stuff for me.

I am going to rally ready next weekend to test it out off-road, but based on how it is handling now, I would have to think it is an improvement.
 

traxem

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Posts
313
Reaction score
127
I have a OBD reader with GPS that’s been tracking my fuel economy. Going to work (short distance), taking local roads, I get around 16.1. If I go highway (longer trips) it nearly doubles. Attached are screen shots of the readings based on trips.

9c3d841de043ae531efd4494e56c8664.jpg
8ade42bf9cb0ab55713ca6d74e8a1b2e.jpg
2c44a80d1f20111a91feb71d4ffb3c14.jpg
 

Blusmbl

Full Access Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Posts
138
Reaction score
47
Location
Plymouth, Michigan
Mine didn't improve appreciably after the first thousand miles. It is definitely sensitive to fuel octane and tire pressure though. 89 or 91 gets worse fuel economy than 93, and I've also lost about 1.5 mpg from lowering the rear tire pressure. Down at 30 because it's comfy but for the next long trip I'm airing them all back up to 42.
 

Raptor Vet

Full Access Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2018
Posts
351
Reaction score
431
Location
Virginia
I am running about 40lbs. tire pressure....been buying 93 octane gas ...17.4 mpg....just around "town"..

2018...gen 2....3.5 ....20 guage...he he


Love it
 

smurfslayer

Be vewwy, vewwy quiet. We’re hunting sasquatch77
Joined
Dec 16, 2016
Posts
17,529
Reaction score
26,972
I just got back from a trip and got to once again test Lucilles distance running. rain was prevalent for a bunch of the trip and when things cleared I got a chance to run I-64 in identical conditions minus the rain, possibly barometric pressure, but temps were equal. The only difference being before I ran the defroster pretty much constantly, after I had a little bit more... cargo... :) and I didn’t run the defroster. I gained almost a solid 1mpg on just not using the defroster / a/c. I got ~16.5 on the before, ~17.25 on the return, same stretch, 70-75mph indicated (mostly the 75).

I never noticed any sudden improvement or degradation the truck’s been consistently since day one.
 
Top