The Tank
FRF Addict
Because the P2 Chassis has been in use since 04 to current F-150. There is nothing wrong with the current F-150.What's your beef with Ford getting involved to evaluate the frame's current design?
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Because the P2 Chassis has been in use since 04 to current F-150. There is nothing wrong with the current F-150.What's your beef with Ford getting involved to evaluate the frame's current design?
BRADYH20: Where did you have you frame "event" occur?
Because the P2 Chassis has been in use since 04 to current F-150. There is nothing wrong with the current F-150.
I'm willing to say there's nothing wrong with the Raptor's frame. Could it be better? Yes, of course.
I've already speculated that I believe the thinner frame section abover the rear axle was designed to enable crumple in a rear-end accident. Putting the bump stop there was necessary (based on minimizing additional costs) and since there haven't been any issues except with Raptors driven very hard offroad that may not be a design flaw on Ford's part. The bump stop and thinner frame work together to let Ford know how the Raptor has been driven. :mrgreen:
Now whether or not we think the Raptor could be driven hard(er) if the frame was thicker there and/or the bump stop was moved, that's a different issue. And yes, I would like to see the bump stop moved or installed a different way (a separate cross member just for the bump stop might work).
I bent my frame in a campground parking lot at Gorman OHV. Long story short, it was overcast and I didn't see three huge whoops. I hit them at just the right speed and the back end slammed down pretty hard.
Spot on. This is a more reasonable analysis than citing how long a certain part of the truck has been in use.
I think I crossed that same parking lot (just north of Alikalik) at high speed and slowed down before the building only to get pretty damned rattled around. Fortunately that "event" only took it out of alignment, but I definitely got out and checked the truck thoroughly. In comparison, and oddly, my frame "event" was not nearly as rough as hitting those huge whoops at Gorman.
Yeah, the issue isn't the Deavers. Deavers are great.
The issue is that if you DO bottom out (and how easy that is will change with different spring and damping rates), the bump stop is mounted to the frame where it's not fully boxed.
SNIP (IMO)
(but unlike MMD, I don't believe Ford did this intentionally to see how hard someone is using the truck... Nor do I believe Ford is not interested in looking at the issue and possibly improving the product... I think they do genuinely care.)
I still don't consider this a flaw... bottom the suspension hard and somethings going to give.