Yeah, they always flout the 10% number, but that's the current sales rate.I laugh because in CA only 1.8% of cars registered are EV's and that's similar in other large states.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Yeah, they always flout the 10% number, but that's the current sales rate.I laugh because in CA only 1.8% of cars registered are EV's and that's similar in other large states.
Right after I received my Lightning, my state announced an EV tax. They are claiming that we arnt paying a road tax via gasoline...meanwhile, my two other ICE vehicles get horrible mileage therefore plenty of road taxes are actually paid. It's idioticI cant wait until they start taxing EV drivers by the mile with on board tracking devices. Hopefully it will red pill some of them , but my guess is no. Too much cognitive dissonance at that point.
Have you taken a look at power sources and supply over a 24hr period? The cheapest and easiest to produce power is obviously used first, and the most expensive are last resort. Coincidentally, many of the plants do not shut units down even when demand is low . This happens to be when most EVs are charged. The vehicles allow you to schedule times.Electric power would be a viable choice if range was about 75-100% better across the board, but it’s not. As it is, I could use an electric truck for local trips, but not sure how I’d be traveling with one.
But let’s assume for the sake of discussion that there will be mass adoption of electrics in the coming decade. “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction"
At 5% adoption, you’ll hear mutterings of charge restrictions, when you can charge, how much. At 10% adoption, rules, regulations and laws will be discussed. Also, Utility companies will cry for mercy from the taxpayers.
Rate hikes will ensue, taxes will be raised to “improve the infrastructure” to support EV charging. We’ll be paying for electric vehicles whether we like it or not. We already are, we’ll just be paying more.
It’s fine to be a Hollywood EV huckster, but in states with real winters and real cold, EV power won’t be that big of a hit. Minnesota is already whining about their proposed adoption of CA regs - several states follow CA emissions standards and are now faced with deciding if they can and should follow the mandatory no new ICE sales CA is adopting.
Have you taken a look at power sources and supply over a 24hr period? The cheapest and easiest to produce power is obviously used first, and the most expensive are last resort. Coincidentally, many of the plants do not shut units down even when demand is low . This happens to be when most EVs are charged. The vehicles allow you to schedule times.
I'm not claiming that EVs won't tax the grid. Just that nighttime charging is the best time for both owners and utility companies, and that many areas have a "surplus" at those times.
I'm not claiming that EVs won't tax the grid. Just that nighttime charging is the best time for both owners and utility companies, and that many areas have a "surplus" at those times.
The current EV push is a prime example of putting the cart before the horse.