I'm curious Brad, why raise these issues 8 months later?
Also, if ICON was concerned with the results, why at the time would Dylan, an ICON rep, use words like "excellent", "accurate" and "well done" to describe them?
What's changed?
Apparently some one pissed in my corn flakes this morning before I even woke up....
Here is what Dylan said "The tests are accurate and well done just not to the same stroke length. That is why it was assumed there were 2 zones in each direction when actually there are 3. (although you can see the third just starting to transition)"