Raptor R vs TRX Drag Race

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

10SpdsOfFury

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2017
Posts
2,607
Reaction score
11,408
Location
Jacksonville FL
Isn’t the Raptor lighter (600ish pounds) and running 4.10 gears? I don’t think 35’s vs 37’s is the only reason. Both are pretty evenly matched.
The weird part is the Raptor can’t catch up from a dig but walked away from a roll. One would think the Raptor once moving would start gaining ground.
 
Last edited:

Russ103

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
838
Reaction score
1,185
Location
MD
There shouldn’t be a Raptor R. Why? Because that’s what every Gen 3 Raptor should have been, period.

Ford chose to ignore the TRX, and stuck the Ecoboost into the Gen 3. That’s when I knew what my Gen 2 replacement would be. The R isn’t a realistic truck for 9/10 of current Raptor owners. And for those who do get one, how do you justify an extra $50k for a truck that at best (I’m being generous here), stays neck and neck with a much lower priced competitor?

As a Ford truck guy, I have no issue whatsoever admitting that the Raptor has been knocked off the 1st place podium. And I can’t wait for my TRX
 

RaptorFan1988

Full Access Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2021
Posts
217
Reaction score
418
Location
NJ
There shouldn’t be a Raptor R. Why? Because that’s what every Gen 3 Raptor should have been, period.

Ford chose to ignore the TRX, and stuck the Ecoboost into the Gen 3. That’s when I knew what my Gen 2 replacement would be. The R isn’t a realistic truck for 9/10 of current Raptor owners. And for those who do get one, how do you justify an extra $50k for a truck that at best (I’m being generous here), stays neck and neck with a much lower priced competitor?

As a Ford truck guy, I have no issue whatsoever admitting that the Raptor has been knocked off the 1st place podium. And I can’t wait for my TRX
If the R isn't the realistic truck for 9/10 current raptor owners, why should it have been what the Gen 3 raptor was, period?? Ford sells trucks that people want, not just what competes with the TRX... The Ecoboost fits the truck for the application, and its a package that fits the most use cases with the least compromise. Crazy that people still think that the Raptor only needs to accelerate quicker than a TRX to be the better truck. Also, a level 2 TRX MSRP is 100k vs 109. If people really wanted TRX's that badly then they'd have the 50k markup. Except they don't.
 

Russ103

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
838
Reaction score
1,185
Location
MD
If the R isn't the realistic truck for 9/10 current raptor owners, why should it have been what the Gen 3 raptor was, period?? Ford sells trucks that people want, not just what competes with the TRX... The Ecoboost fits the truck for the application, and its a package that fits the most use cases with the least compromise. Crazy that people still think that the Raptor only needs to accelerate quicker than a TRX to be the better truck. Also, a level 2 TRX MSRP is 100k vs 109. If people really wanted TRX's that badly then they'd have the 50k markup. Except they don't.
I’m trying to say that if the Gen 3 Raptor had the 5.2 S/C V8 (no super exclusive R needed), the amount of Ford guys with Gen 2 Raptors (myself included) wouldn’t be buying a TRX.

The R seems to be a hastily put together afterthought in response to RAM. I’m not saying anything bad about the R, quite the contrary actually. If the R was as readily available, and priced as the TRX, I’d likely be waiting for my R as we speak vs the TRX I ordered.
 

GordoJay

FRF Addict
Joined
Feb 8, 2020
Posts
7,466
Reaction score
16,005
Location
Colorado
The R seems to be a hastily put together afterthought in response to RAM.
Agreed. But to be fair, Ford is competing with a hastily-built afterthought to a hastily-built afterthought … so it’s apples to apples. I’m happy to want neither. TTV6 is perfect for the stock suspension and unless you’re willing to tear up your warranty, the extra power is just an expensive waste.
 

Russ103

Full Access Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Posts
838
Reaction score
1,185
Location
MD
Agreed. But to be fair, Ford is competing with a hastily-built afterthought to a hastily-built afterthought … so it’s apples to apples. I’m happy to want neither. TTV6 is perfect for the stock suspension and unless you’re willing to tear up your warranty, the extra power is just an expensive waste.
When the TRX debuted in 21, I would (I did actually) have the same thought. But if we’re being fair, the only thing that sucks on the TRX after being out for 2 years, is the low mile range due to the at best 10mpg it gets.

I think it’s fair to admit that RAM built a more then proper competitor, albeit with a lot more hp, which is what sells expensive vehicles in my opinion.
 

wweaver

Full Access Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2016
Posts
445
Reaction score
461
Location
East TN
I think there are several variables here in play. 2wd in the R? Did the driver sandbag it, etc. More videos will come out and unless the R is reallyyy pulling power to save the transmission on a launch it should win these races. Over the next few months we will see all sorts of these head to head races posted.
 

Billy Mc

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Posts
30
Reaction score
40
Location
Conroe Texas
I think there are several variables here in play. 2wd in the R? Did the driver sandbag it, etc. More videos will come out and unless the R is reallyyy pulling power to save the transmission on a launch it should win these races. Over the next few months we will see all sorts of these head to head races posted.

Even side by side, as in this video there are a lot of variables that go into a drag race.

Just find it hard to believe that so many folks put so much attention on 0-60 or ¼ run when it comes to judging how good an "off-road" truck is supposed to be.
 
Top