The Sasquatching is off the charts with this one, you never fail to disappoint. You aren’t getting 17MPG out of the 6.2 you claim to own, you’re making an absolute fool of yourself with your lies. Gen 2 Raptor easily achieved its EPA numbers, you wouldn’t know because you don’t own one and only care about spreading misinformation and lies. And as far as needing boost to move…I have never seen a dumber or more ignorant statement.Problem with this statement. You fail to recognize that your pedal has to be to the floor (in boost) all the time to get this thing to move. If you are downhill, maybe not in boost! This community is here to tell you that the emmpeeegeeezzzz is not the ecoboost strong suit. It gets real world same or worse than a 6.2. In a typical tank, my 6.2 gets 17 mixed. My other 6.2 with cylinder deactivation gets 21, and my deleted diesel gets 22. Ecoboost in a car is good on empeeeegeezzz, but truck…. NO.
Way to continue to show that you know absolutely nothing about parallel turbo systems. That comes as no surprise though.Absolutely not the case. Window stickers show and prove it is 5.2sc. Why would you want a turbo 5.0? It wasn’t designed for that long term. Boost lag would suck too. Turbo is good for a drag car with a floored/rev limited boost launch.