Raptor R Dyno

[MTF]

Good to know that raptor r #’s are within reach on an ecoboost truck.

You are forgetting two things!
Those numbers are on 37" tires.
It's been De-Tuned from 760 FWHP to 700 FWHP
And it passes Ford's engine durability test at those numbers!!!!!
You can't get the Raptor's 3.5L to pass if and I mean if, you came close to those numbers.

 

[MTF]

Or pulley it and better exhaust.

Yeah, that supercharger is under pulleyed.
Plus, Ford put that limiter on the throttle body not to open up 100% till 3,500 rpm
And de-Tuned from 760 FWHP to 700 FWHP.

Should sound a little more like this, even though I'm on 35" the gear selection is better on the 23 Raptor R

 

[FordTechOne]

Yeah, that supercharger is under pulleyed.
Plus, Ford put that limiter on the throttle body not to open up 100% till 3,500 rpm
And de-Tuned from 760 FWHP to 700 FWHP.

Should sound a little more like this, even though I'm on 35" the gear selection is better on the 23 Raptor R

Claiming it’s “underpulleyed” based on the sound is not only baseless, but it’s ridiculous. It’s not a 10 year old Whipple; it’s an Eaton TVS, they are multitudes quieter while being much more efficient than older supercharger designs.

 

[FordTechOne]

You are forgetting two things!
Those numbers are on 37" tires.
It's been De-Tuned from 760 FWHP to 700 FWHP
And it passes Ford's engine durability test at those numbers!!!!!
You can't get the Raptor's 3.5L to pass if and I mean if, you came close to those numbers.

You’re forgetting that you have data to back that claim up, nor any of the other nonsense you post. You’re twice (thrice?) blown up 6.2 couldn’t pass even a basic durability test nor a gas station, the fact that you think your 2V boat anchor is on the same playing field as an R is comical at best. The only thing more entertaining would be seeing how inflated your “560HP” dyno numbers are with an EcoBoost or R on the same dyno.

 

[Stormtrooper]

Don’t stop now guys… I’ll be right back, just grabbing some popcorn now that the show has started…

 

[thatJeepguy]

Honestly the 37’s prolly take about 20 horse off…

 

[MTF]

You’re forgetting that you have data to back that claim up, not any of the other nonsense you post. You’re twice (thrice?) blown up 6.2 couldn’t pass even a basic durability test nor a gas station, the fact that you think your 2V boat anchor is on the same playing field as an R is comical at best. The only thing more entertaining would be seeing how inflated your “560HP” dyno numbers are with an EcoBoost or R on the same dyno.

You're still being an a_ _, stop reading you own negative mental thoughts into my posts.
And then makeup lies to support your baseless claims.
Where in the world are you seeing I'm comparing my truck to the new 23 Raptor R.
And where did I mention the decibel level in my statement. I was pointing out, spool up.
You open up that air box and it will be just as loud!!!!
Even with proof on the numbers my truck produces, you still just want to be ignorant about it and make baseless claims to what you assume you know about my truck.

 

[1BAD454SSv2]

I remember a post where someone said Ford will never use a 5.2 engine in a truck . Who was that again?

 

[WMRaptor]

I ordered the filter now I can claim 1 more HP than TRX LOL

 

[FordTechOne]

You're still being an a_ _, stop reading you own negative mental thoughts into my posts.
And then makeup lies to support your baseless claims.
Where in the world are you seeing I'm comparing my truck to the new 23 Raptor R.
And where did I mention the decibel level in my statement. I was pointing out, spool up.
You open up that air box and it will be just as loud!!!!
Even with proof on the numbers my truck produces, you still just want to be ignorant about it and make baseless claims to what you assume you know about my truck.

Superchargers don’t “spool up”. In any direct comparison between the TVS and Whipple, the TVS is going to be significantly quieter. It’s the design, which you don’t seem to understand. It has nothing to do with being “under pulleyed”