MY19 just under 18k miles, zero issues... wondering if I have a phaser "time bomb" that *will* go off some day?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

braptorin

Active Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Posts
98
Reaction score
13
I'm so confused by the cam phaser issue and I'm a very low milage driver 98% street queen. I remember getting my cam phaser recall notice years ago and the dealer told me it was just to fix them *if they had failed* but that they would not proactively do it. Fine by me, whatever. My question now: are the phasers basically guaranteed to fail at some point? Maybe there's a specific mfg month where we know the problem was corrected at manufacture time? I don't remember my date offhand but I bought my truck in Feb 2020 so it might be a late 2019 build (I'm just guessing).
 

julien194b

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
May 26, 2018
Posts
1,110
Reaction score
1,798
Location
Europe FR.
Date production is written on the door sticker .
I think , it as been said so many time that we should all remember it, if truck is built from december 2019 , it's ok , you should have already new design part and program update !
Edit: And the day they will fail, you will know it, don't worry !
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
B

braptorin

Active Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Posts
98
Reaction score
13
Date production is written on the door sticker .
I think , it as been said so many time that we should all remember it, if truck is built from december 2019 , it's ok , you should have already new design part and program update !
Edit: And the day they will fail, you will know it, don't worry !
I checked my sticker: my truck was produced in September of 2019... so my question stands: what is the probability they are going to fail?
 

dsiggi

Full Access Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Posts
375
Reaction score
226
Location
Detroit
I checked my sticker: my truck was produced in September of 2019... so my question stands: what is the probability they are going to fail?
Depending on who you talk to this is debatable. I've been told the numbers are fairly low, but thats improbable because they don't issue Customer Satisfaction Bulletins for things that don't often happen. You may be better off having one of the latest phaser designs due to your production date.

My personal experience across about 7 trucks, 5 raptors including mine and 2 Lariats, all have needed phasers at least once some multiple times. Mine was about 55k miles. Others were sooner or about the same. YMMV.
 

V6Raptor

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Posts
242
Reaction score
273
Location
SoCal
I checked my sticker: my truck was produced in September of 2019... so my question stands: what is the probability they are going to fail?

Probability: who knows. My ‘19 failed around 9k miles. I can’t remember exactly but I believe it was a March build.
 

John813

FRF Addict
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Posts
1,122
Reaction score
837
Location
PSL/Jupiter
I have a 17 with the original plastic pan and no OASIS of the phaser being replaced. Original owner took the truck every 3-5k miles for any service to the same dealer I bought it from/I know the advisors.

It may fail tonight, or it may last another 7 years.
 

FordTechOne

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Posts
6,664
Reaction score
13,040
Location
Detroit
I checked my sticker: my truck was produced in September of 2019... so my question stands: what is the probability they are going to fail?
You have the part number that is 1 revision behind the current part. They are fine as long as you had the updated programming completed, preferably at low mileage. Since you didn’t, you likely have accelerated wear on the phaser locking mechanism.

You can still have the update done as customer pay, but the wear may already be there. Either way it’s better to have the update regardless, you’ll want it installed if the VCT units do ever need to be replaced.
 

smurfslayer

Be vewwy, vewwy quiet. We’re hunting sasquatch77
Joined
Dec 16, 2016
Posts
17,548
Reaction score
27,019
I've been told the numbers are fairly low, but thats improbable because they don't issue Customer Satisfaction Bulletins for things that don't often happen. You may be better off having one of the latest phaser designs due to your production date.

You would be surprised to find out just how low of a failure rate over expected it takes to make it less costly to just bite the bullet and spring for replacement. It’s singe digit percentages in some cases, depending on parts & labor cost, reputational risk, customer animosity etc.

As an example, I’d probably go with the 2017 - ’18 plastic oil pan, still not leaking on my truck 7 years on. The part is not that expensive and of course they will exhaust current inventory before using a revised pan, so you get the same part with the same intricate replacement procedure that few stealerships seem to be able to follow. This is where I think Ford had the problem - repeat failures because of poor workmanship.

Phasers I think were a combination of issues, where they didn’t fully appreciate the duty cycle problem, but, who’s to say there weren’t some early revisions that may have actually been defective? we don’t really know that. We now understand that flashing that duty cycle prevents further excessive wear. Either way, the initial diagnostic failures led to errant troubleshooting, and probably several hundreds of phaser repairs that may not have been needed were the duty cycle identified sooner. Maybe. Unlike the oil pan, where the proper procedure to get a good seal was well known from the jump, the phaser issue may not have been properly identified by Ford engineering. How many repeat phaser repairs did we have on FRF from ’17 - ’19? More than a few.

However, the phaser repair is labor intensive, and cost intensive, so I believe fewer of the phasers were needed to reach the CSP threshold - several hundreds in parts cost, plus the labor.

The failure rate is unpredictable, largely influenced by maintenance practices, and use case.
 
Top