What drove the decision to with a zero offset vs. a more positive offset closer to the stock profile?
Love the looks of the wheel but I'm not to sure about adding just over 3" to the overall track width of my truck.
Cerberos,
The decision to go with the offset we did is for two main reasons. First, they allow you to run the RPG 1.5" Upper Control Arm. Second, this offset allows for the fender wells to be more filled out allowing for a more aggressive stance.
Oh ya, 1:30 works good for me tomorrow.
---------- Post added at 10:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 PM ----------
Wasn't sure never dealt with beadlocks
---
I am here:
Google Maps
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They aren't the headache they are made out to be. After the initial torquing, check them again after 100 miles or so. Once you do that, you won't have to worry about them again.
Modern day beadlocks balance out perfect if done right and you can run them like any other wheel.
---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 PM ----------
There are so many fake-locks on the market, most cops are not bothering to inspect the wheels. In my experience, it's always the clapped out POS with 20 violations visible from 100 feet that would get pulled over and written up. It is very rare for a well built and clean truck to be pulled over for a violation that is very difficult to see.
Very true. I never once got hassled by the police with bead locks. The way the laws are written, or shall I say not written. You are more likely to break a traffic law driving to work tomorrow than you are breaking the law with a beadlock. I mean who drives 55mph in a 55mph???