Gen 3 motor went to port and direct injection. Port injection during idle and direct under load.
I believe it was to counter the oil buildup issues on the valves which is why this catch-can has a need for Gen 2 and less so for Gen 3. Gen 3 still has oil passing by the valves, but the port injection under idle should be cleaning the top of the valves or keeping them from having carbon buildup.
As stated the dual fuel system was implemented for the Gen 2.
It was NOT done to combat intake valve build up. That is a secondary reason/benefit.
If that were the case all direct injection engines would have dual fuel systems (if the sole reason was for intake valves deposit build up).
Currently there are only a couple engines I know of that have dual fuel systems. They are both over 3.2 liters and originally just had direct fuel injection.
Direct fuel injection is inefficient at lower engine speeds and creates a lot of soot. The government told manufacturers to lower the soot level. Believe it or not we came extremely close to having particulate filters on gas engines to combat this issue.
The dual fuel system takes care of this and was the only reason it came to be (government mandates).
If you look at an older direct injection engine the tail pipes will be black with soot.
My wife's 2013 SHO tail pipes are normally as dirty or dirtier than my 7.3 powerstroke. My 2020 Raptor has almost no soot.
The dual fuel system works like this.
Port fuel injection from idle to 3000 rpm, 3000-4000rpm both systems are working (gradual switch to direct injection) by 4000 rpm the engine is running on direct injection only.
The excess soot may be related to bore size, as no engine I know of below 3 liters has dual fuel system.
PS there is at least 1 gas engine out there with a particulate filter, it is either a Jaguar or a Maserati (can't remember which one I saw it on about a year ago, but thought thank God I don't have one)