HPE 2017 Raptor Dyno pulls and 0-60 times

[SilverBolt]

0-60 in 5.3? That seems pretty quick for a 5500 lb brick. 14.1 1/4 is pretty fast too. Those numbers are very close to the Gen-2 Lightning numbers. They were about 600lbs lighter and way more aerodynamic.

 

[FordFanStan]

STD numbers, I didn't see the correction factor though. I would've liked to see them start their pull earlier in the rpm range too for this type of vehicle.

 

[BurnOut]

0-60 in 5.3? That seems pretty quick for a 5500 lb brick. 14.1 1/4 is pretty fast too.

Understand that I'm not trying to start a Gen I vs. Gen II pissing contest, but does anyone know how these numbers compare to the Gen I? And what sorts of mods would have been required to get a Gen I to perform the same? Headers and a tune, or...?

 

[FordFanStan]

I'd bet that they're worse... it didn't seem to have a traction problem in 2WD, and adding the driveline drag of the 4WD stuff wouldn't do it any favors.

And in Baja Mode, who know what mode they had it in for the video..

They obviously didn't have the locker engaged with that one wheel peel

 

[shelteredraptor]

thanks for posting the numbers. I am unable to watch any video that shows that ******* crook anywhere but behind bars.

 

[Chris's FX4]

Understand that I'm not trying to start a Gen I vs. Gen II pissing contest, but does anyone know how these numbers compare to the Gen I? And what sorts of mods would have been required to get a Gen I to perform the same? Headers and a tune, or...?

2012 supercrew was 6.9sec for 0-60mph and 15.4sec at 91mph in the quarter according to a MotorTrend article. Car & Driver did a 2013 supercab in 6.7sec 0-60mph and 15.3sec at 93mph in the quarter.

 

[Bombsquad68]

Understand that I'm not trying to start a Gen I vs. Gen II pissing contest, but does anyone know how these numbers compare to the Gen I? And what sorts of mods would have been required to get a Gen I to perform the same? Headers and a tune, or...?

320-330 rwhp, 340-350 rwtq from what I saw. Could do bolt ons for that hp but that torque would probably be heads/cams at minimum.

 

[BurnOut]

2012 supercrew was 6.9sec for 0-60mph and 15.4sec at 91mph in the quarter according to a motor trend article. Car & Driver did a 2013 supercab in 6.7sec 0-60mph and 15.3sec at 93mph in the quarter.

Geez, if those numbers are accurate, I'd say that it'd take either a fairly serious N/A build (cams, bumped compression, etc...) or maybe a low-boost supercharger (something Eaton-based) to knock 1.2 seconds off of the quarter-mile time. Obviously, 0-60 and 1/4 mile isn't what these trucks are about, but still... there's some perspective to be gained here.

One thing that'd be interesting to me would be to get a Gen II truck ballasted up to the same weight as a Gen I, and see how they compare at that point...

 

[ManfromSnowyRiver]

Seems like enough power to me. Nice not to have to build a motor to haul A$$!

 

[ThugHunter]

Not that a ton of people will be doing mods to achieve better 1/4 times in this truck, but I'm anxious to see how much hp can be made and what kind of numbers people will be making once the engine mods begin.