CR Gittere
Full Access Member
my dudes, please don't over-generalize the answers. It makes the whole conversation a lot more challenging.
OP - you get both additional up-travel and down-travel. The length of the "shock shaft" by itself doesn't matter. unless you somehow designed a shock in which the shaft could poke out of the top of the shock body, the main limiting factor is the way the factory shocks are mounted. Ford has to consider the packaging of the truck, as well as cost and margin. They make concessions and iterative improvements to placate enthusiasts.
My truck has a bypass rack. I have Deaver +3HDs. I have stock length, custom shackles. ( these provide no additional travel by themselves. they just move more freely than stock shackles.) I have traction bars. My truck cycles a hair over 21". it is smack dab in the middle at 10.5" of up and 10.5" of down. Where did the travel come from? A slightly longer, progressive leaf spring, a much different upper and lower shock mount, and a longer shock to accommodate the travel.
The crazy thing is one of those iterative improvements that ford made in the gen2 raptor is the rear frame geometry. It is actually so good that going spring under might net you 2ish additional inches of up travel over spring under. Almost like they understood that the craziest enthusiasts would happily cut a couple of big holes in the bed, slap some big shocks in, and go beat the trucks. ( because that is what happened with a lot of Gen 1s.)
Now, since we're on the subject of shock mounting, it brings me to the next question: Yes, you could use the live valve shocks, get more travel and retain that functionality.
BUT, and it is a very big BUT, The suspension design would need to change to something like a cantilever to pull this off. The challenge would be that the If/Than logic in the BCM that manipulates the valving would also need to be modified for the new dynamics of the cantilever suspension. I'm not aware of an offroad company that have the r&d budget to bring that all together in a functional package, so any cantilever option you would pick would most likely come with traditional "dumb" shocks.
Thats what I said, either redesign, move mounting points of shock, all create more clearance... Thats the simple one sentence answer to a very complicated question