Let’s see who initiated the conversation unprovoked, as usual:Your co-workers must really love you.. Talk about an angry person LOL.
More insults again. As usual.
You talk so much trash that you can’t remember what you even posted.It's almost like someone that has a salary deriving from failures of Ford products might have an interest in downplaying the problematic engines while also deriding the reliable engines. The problem engines consistantly bring in big dollar, out of warranty jobs.
Look at the vast majority of your comments in the Gen 2 and 3 forums. You do nothing but fear monger and insinuate that people are doomed unless they bought a Gen 1."False narratives". What are you even talking about?
Well apparently you buy poorly maintained - or just plain old - vehicles. That is not indicative of the larger population in any way.Is it a false narrative that a n/an engine is inherently more reliable than a turbo engine- given, you know the lack of turbos to fail? Never replaced a single turbo on my n/a V8s (go figure). Every turbo engine I've owned has eventually had one or more turbos replaced in the time I've owned it. Light blue haze at startup.
You fail to acknowledge the added complexity of a turbo system leads to more failures. Simply "maintaining it" does not change that.
As far as reliability, you can’t claim differences based simply on part count. By your logic, a BMW M5 V10 is less problematic than a Neon SRT-4 because one has a turbo and the other doesn’t. That’s simply ridiculous.