Aftermarket UCAs won't solve any problems unless they are longer (that creates a whole new set of problems) because the shock travel down will still be the same amount. So if there weren't any limiting factors upper and lower would eventually fold down to flat. So you can see at a certain point you run out of room.
With a 1.5 spacer the overall length is too long for the stock cv's. That additional length binds the cv and they get killed very quickly. With the gen2 shocks even longer than that the cv's wont be long for this world.
There are aftermarket cv's that work in extreme angles (i think rcv?) But they are 3k+
So If you install the gen2 shocks you 100% need limiting straps. In 2wd you could drive forever, in 4wd 10 minutes or less the cv's are done
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
So, if I'm understanding the mechanics of this and your explanation correctly, the added range of travel allowed by the longer Gen2 shock causes two issues. At some point in the downward travel, there is physical contact between the inside of the UCA and the coil spring. The other being, that at some point, the angle imposed on the CV joints is too extreme and exceeds their maximum design angle so they fail.
A more open interior space design on an aftermarket UCA may relieve the impact issue with the spring, but there are definitive limits to that, and lengthening creates more issues due to how the UCA and LCA components function together. The CV issue remains and is actually now worsened by additional UCA travel because the spring is no longer acting as a suspension "stop".
By installing a limiting strap and truncating the travel to Gen1 OEM limits, both issues are completely mitigated, due to the fact that the suspension travel is stopped before either scenario is experienced. That, or never driving the truck so that extreme-travel is achieved.
Thanks for the information and clarification - it really makes good sense now.
Anyone have experience/recommendations for limiting straps?