GEN 1 Eibach +3 front springs

[98rangerdave]

Installed! I hope they settle.... haha sky high at the moment.

 

[bmyers4321]

Installed! I hope they settle.... haha sky high at the moment.

View attachment 139547

Pics of the truck? Considering this option until I can do something more serious.

 

[Big Blue]

Just did the same to my truck. Eibachs up fronts and icon rxt springs rear without the added leaf and it sits perfect. Ride is excellent no more rear chatter over bumps




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks perfect, are the front shocks at OEM low perch or are they at mid-perch with the Eibachs?

P.S.; You need to dovetail that rear.

 

[robbys3m3]

I'm loving the eibachs on my 2010

 

[Big Blue]

I'm loving the eibachs on my 2010

View attachment 159384

Sweet. 37s or 35s? and same question as above, with the Eibachs are your shocks on stock perch or midperch? Thanks

 

[robbys3m3]

Sweet. 37s or 35s? and same question as above, with the Eibachs are your shocks on stock perch or midperch? Thanks

37's on stock perch

 

[GunnyMac]

Hello, from all the research I’ve done and read, your shocks have to be set all low perch for the Eibach springs.

 

[II Sevv]

The stock fox shocks are valved to perform best at mid perch. Ford set the stock shocks to low perch from factory to meet federal pedestrian impact height regulations. Also, alignment cams don’t do anything but assist in keeping your alignment over time, and providing a greater distribution of torque. I have king 3.0’s cranked up to about top height and have uniball non-adjustable upper control arms and have not run out of stock camber/caster adjustment. Unless going far past top perch in height, adjustable arms are a waste of money.

 

[B E N]

The stock fox shocks are valved to perform best at mid perch. Ford set the stock shocks to low perch from factory to meet federal pedestrian impact height regulations.

Can you cite this?

 

[II Sevv]

Can you cite this?

That’s what I heard from the Ford SVT reps. Other than their word, there’s no way to prove it.