The root cause is irrelevant; publishing that does not add any value. It’s no different than any other vehicle concern, if the customer has a symptom, the dealer searches OASIS and follows the appropriate service message. Manufacturers can’t directly control dealers, but that’s a different discussion about the franchise model. Which I think most people have a negative perception of due to the issues you cited.Did they though? I don’t remember ever seeing what is exactly wrong with a faulty shock, just that it might be faulty if there’s a clunking noise and to have it replaced. The TSB is also subjective to the dealer hearing the noise or even being willing to put chassis ears on the suspension to identify the noise. There have been a number of guys who go to the dealer and the dealer doesn’t hear anything or wont go the extra step of putting the chassis ears on. That then requires the customer to either go to another dealer or record a video with their own chassis ears.
Recalls are for safety issues, not a clunk noise that the dealer can easily resolve if they follow the service message. It would be a huge waste of time and inconvenience for every Raptor owner to schedule an appointment at the dealer when they don’t even have a concern. Once again, why does the manufacturer need to “disclose” the issue? That changes nothing; if the shock is noisy it needs to be replaced. You’re not going to go out to your truck and identify an internal valving issue by looking at it.A recall would resolve all the work the customer has to do to prove they’re hearing the clunk and that’s not something we should be doing on a brand new $100k truck. Ford knows more than they’re letting on about these shocks and they’re either bound by an NDA to not disclose the fault or are refusing to disclose it so they don’t have every owner of a 21-22 and early ‘23 models getting them replaced. Leaving it as a TSB with subjective wording like “hearing a clunk” puts the onus on the customer and dealer to come to the same conclusion and to me that’s messed up.
Every owner of a Gen 3 does not need their shocks replaced because not every shock has the issue. They published a service message just as they would for any other “known” concern. That’s the standard across the industry; there is no conspiracy theory here.
There is nothing to “look” for. Do you think they’re paying dealers to use diagnostic equipment and road test the truck if they could just have them check the engineering part number instead? Hearing a noise and pinpointing it to a component is a diagnosis; it identifies the causal part.It should either be a straight recall/replacement, or Ford comes out and tells the dealers exactly what to “Look” for, not hear. Hearing is diagnosing a symptom but not identifying what the true problem is.