Badgertits
FRF Addict
Ummm, except it’s a cast iron block, so not really that similar. Typically not used for performance applications due to the weight- but can potentially equate to stronger bottom end & capable of holding big power better- few generations removed Shelby for instance.Those figures sound about right. The 7.3 is an aluminum head, iron block pushrod engine. Very similar to a GM LS engine or Chrysler 5.7/6.4/6.2 Hemi.
I wouldn’t want an FE block V8 in a 1/2 ton these days. At Least not a factory mass produced one, Performance crate motor- sure! Depending on application.
they ain’t putting a V8 in new raptor and if they were, it certainly wouldn’t be a heavier slower rotating cast iron big block. Why the hell would they do that after putting massive investment/R&D toward EB/hybrid lighter power trains & lighter weight AL constructed body designs? Especially in an offroad performance truck. Why do you think dodge doesn’t put the Cummins in the power wagon?
my point about AL vs steel body construction when shopping used Raptors just rings more true every day since the gen 1 steel bodies are that much older, that much rustier, w/ higher mileage running engines no longer produced by Ford that may turn to be an issue sourcing parts down the line.
Taking the engine discussion outta the equation- the tranny, suspension, frame, body construction, tech, interior, transfer case, & drive modes are ALL superior w/o discussion.
now that the gen 1 is so long in the tooth & the gen 2 has been out a while Ford will be debuting newer designs of both standard F150 & raptor in the near future. At this point if the only sticking point is am Bach gets a damn V8 the gen 1s are getting so old may as well start looking @ low mileage 17”s when new F150/Raptor comes out & prices drop even further getting a gen 2 and doing a V8 swap. Best of both worlds.