Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Far from. Whomever would replace him--which could be a nightmare in itself--could be even worse and advocate for continued pressure. Not as simple as Putin disappearing. And in the mean time US will continue to suffer with high gas prices for a long time to come because of greenie policies.
thehill.com
problem is who replaces him and that could be scary with a country that has 10k nukes. brandon will put him in his place you will see. remember he said he is the only one with the balls to go toe to toe with putin. keeping my composure while typing this is difficult haha
Not putin but brandon, he is responsible for all this chaos, first he killed american energy independence then messed with saudi's then took houthis off terrorist list then he turned away from UAE, and then gave pipe dreams to ukraine to join NATO and EU, cheerleaded them to fight russia, now he is giving iran nuclear to fight israel, he wants the global oil industry phased out, next century wars will be fought for mining materials for battery EV
I wish I could say that you're wrong. But. Did you just see that the undersecretary of state testified under oath in open committee that Ukraine has biological research labs and we're very concerned that they'll fall into Russian hands? In response to Rubio's question about whether Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons. WTF? After all of the denials and fact checks saying that it's Russian propaganda? It's true? This is all starting to look like we egged Putin on. Fu*king everyone loves a good war. If Putin goes nuclear, his best bet is to leave DC strictly alone. They're doing more damage to our country than all of our enemies combined.
Did u know what happened last time when they said there is WMD in iraq? And now says ok to IRAN, its lot like white house always want to have an enemy and if by chance they end up not having one, hey wtf lets make one! Am not supporting an invasion or killing innocent people but thats what is going on for the last 2 decades. Why is it that always we only hear one side of the story where is the other side? Every story has 2 sides! Proxy war with putin using ukraine as a decoy is not fair to ukrainian people but did anyone wiki what is azov battalion? There is lot to this story than we are all made to know using popular media outlets (funded by open society aka soros) CNN, BBC, MSNBC the list goes on. My guts tell me the war picture they paint to us is far from whats happening on the ground!
If you assume that each media outlet is captured by a special interest, an intelligence agency, a political party, an activist like Soros, or a corporate interest like the MIC, it all makes sense. No one knows what's REALLY happening in Ukraine. For instance, where are all of the videos? When Russia attacked in Syria, there were a ton of them. Even compilations showing the tank view and the anti-tank crew's opposite perspective of the same attack. It was amazing. So what appears to be coming out of Ukraine, video-wise? In comparison, crickets. Why?
