My evidence is your own internet cowboy threat coupled with your refusal to explain what else you meant.
Luckily I have tons of patience because you don't come across as someone that gets to the truth very often.
While completely skipping over that consulting a shop is normal.
Nice low blow trying to challenge someone on the internets integrity while also trying to get them to admit they wanted to physically harm someone. I simply said jim didn't want to be in a ring with me. Nothing threatening or sinister about it, my opinion in response to another members statement. You are hilarious though keep going.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:22 PM ----------
Also let's get semi technical, I responded to an opinion which, was a hypothetical situation. No threat of force just an opinion based on a hypothetical. Would you like to continue losing a legal battle?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk