Giant motorsports ddl kit install

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
ntm

ntm

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Posts
886
Reaction score
946
Location
Alberta, Canada
image.jpg2_zpsnurxwjpw.jpg

image.jpg1_zpsl70wuear.jpg

image.jpg3_zpsvdaiulsz.jpg

Works out to 1" of driveline plunge, pinion angle stays within 2 degrees for most of the travel until full droop where it rolls up 6 degrees to minimize plunge as much as possible.
Anti squat is 90% at ride height, 65% at 4" of compression from ride height, 40% at full bump. 110% at full droop.
 

RLTW

FRF Addict
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Posts
3,626
Reaction score
2,465
Location
TX
awesome, and way to technical for me, a little out of my comfort zone for understanding there lol.
 
OP
OP
ntm

ntm

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Posts
886
Reaction score
946
Location
Alberta, Canada
Three link setup is working great !

Ditched the axle control shocks entirely and cut in a currie sway bar.
Antisquat behaviour is improved with the three link geometry, it doesn't "stiffen" up the rear suspension quite as much under throttle. That translates to a less jarring trip across the top of the whoops.

I was corresponding with Geoff in regards to the axle shock failing under a tension load. He says they are now building their own axle shocks that have doubled the size of the piston retaining shaft and nut. If he sends me some comparison pics I'll post them up here.
Not sure why the reluctance to market it as a three link, overall cost would be the same, and it's really not much more work to do.


Sway bar was pretty straight forward, hole saw through the frame, slide the outer tubing through and weld it up. Put a couple tabs on top of the ddl axle brackets, just need to order a couple heims to allow double shear mounting at the axle now.
Sorry about the picture quality, my iPhone 6+ camera is taking a dump.


image_zpshbgfpalz.jpg

image_zpsxkw4xfkf.jpg

image_zpsykhtlspe.jpg

image.jpg5_zpsszhzuoft.jpg

image_zpsbdyxztkb.jpg

 

Wrecker

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Posts
77
Reaction score
42
Location
Grand Junction, CO
Truck looks like it's working great now! I always wondered how well these kits would work in their stock form and had my doubts.

I had a radius arm setup on the front of my Ultra 4 car and I didn't like it at all, by nature the binding and resistance to move when you're hard on the gas made the front end a lot stiffer than it should've been. I swapped it over to a 3-link also and it made a world of difference and actually let the shocks do the work instead of the suspension just binding up, such a smoother ride.
 
OP
OP
ntm

ntm

Full Access Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2011
Posts
886
Reaction score
946
Location
Alberta, Canada
Truck looks like it's working great now! I always wondered how well these kits would work in their stock form and had my doubts.

I had a radius arm setup on the front of my Ultra 4 car and I didn't like it at all, by nature the binding and resistance to move when you're hard on the gas made the front end a lot stiffer than it should've been. I swapped it over to a 3-link also and it made a world of difference and actually let the shocks do the work instead of the suspension just binding up, such a smoother ride.

Yeah, the alteration in anti squat is mostly from where I mounted the third link in relation to the lower link pockets. Now under throttle the rotational moment of the rear axle pulls the chassis downwards enough to cancel out the upwards thrust vector of the relatively short lower link arms required by a crew cab.
Geoff would kick me in the balls for talking antisquat numbers, as they are so heavily influenced by a bunch of other factors like valving, weight distribution, ride height, etc. But it's just flat out working better now, can't argue with that.
 

Wrecker

Full Access Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Posts
77
Reaction score
42
Location
Grand Junction, CO
Yeah, the alteration in anti squat is mostly from where I mounted the third link in relation to the lower link pockets. Now under throttle the rotational moment of the rear axle pulls the chassis downwards enough to cancel out the upwards thrust vector of the relatively short lower link arms required by a crew cab.
Geoff would kick me in the balls for talking antisquat numbers, as they are so heavily influenced by a bunch of other factors like valving, weight distribution, ride height, etc. But it's just flat out working better now, can't argue with that.

Exactly, a lot of other factors are going to play a roll in shooting for an exact anti squat number which isn't realistic on these trucks unless you are dealing with a full back half, but a radius arm setup is about as far in the wrong direction you can go. Anything to get that number heading in the right direction though is only going help.
 
Top