.
What has me concerned is your suggestion that Ford didn't re-optimize the suspension. Are you only getting this information based on your test drives?
Edit: btw...GM generally doesn't let you spec spring/shock rates any more/less than Ford does (i.e., major suspension packages). The part numbers are certainly different though and have different specs.
Cut the first line of your quote out.
I'm a longtime Ford customer and SVT owner.
Fox is simply a supplier and marketing ploy/namesake. Ford/SVT worked with them to spec the shocks to a price/performance point.
That said, having driven a 6.2 Supercab and SuperCrew back to back within 30mins of each other (drove one, then the other, same area of town, same day). To me, the Crew has NOT had the suspension redone in any significant manner. The front end felt dumpy and overloaded in the Crew. It needed to be picked up to the 2nd notch desperately. The Super was ok; but needed it done as well, but was livable. Part of the feel is the longer wheelbase makes the truck a *little* more sluggish overall. It's not drastic, but if you're used to performance vehicles, you notice it right away.
I was surprised that the turning radius of the Crew wasn't as bad as I thought. However, *any* hint of sportiness you may feel in a SuperCab is lost in the Crew.
And IMO; the Crew is due to market demand. Customers want the crew, Ford wanted it because it sells, so they go to the parts bin and grab what they can. The Supercab felt balanced and correct to me. The Crew needs about a 30 to 50# increase in the front spring rates to get the feel back.
And if you're so concerned that they didn't make any changes; why don't you find two VIN's. One for a SCAB, one for a CREW (both 6.2) and get a parts dept. guy to look up and compare the part numbers for the shocks/springs. I bet you'll be disappointed. The Crew is mostly about marketing and sales. The truck will still perform well; but not as well as a SCAB.
Last edited: