disagree ....people are LAZY....when they way a good % dont give 100% of their time to the project.
If the managers do their job correctly.......being colocated with your teams is WAY more efficient. It is not a distraction.
It's going to depend on the job, the employee, and the manager. I had more bad managers than good. The good ones gave me room to work by acting as a shit umbrella, keeping the rain of corporate crap from getting in my way. The bad ones were a PITA. A couple lived for meetings. One could literally waste half of my day with one meeting. And we had daily meetings. The open office structure was a disaster for my productivity. Yes, I could get a question answered by walking twenty feet. But anyone could interrupt me at any time. And they did. It was a net loss. Since all of my jobs had flexible hours. I got more done between 6:00 and 8:00am than I did the whole rest of the day because I was the only one in the office. I would then leave at 2:30pm and fu*k you if you schedule a meeting at 4pm. Many jobs require focus. That requires freedom from interruption. And if you need a certain job done, who cares whether it takes your employee four hours a day, four days a week, with the workday starting at midnight, on a laptop from a ***** bar, so long as the job is done well and on time?
Yes, there needs to be communication, up, down, and sideways. But many jobs are easier and more pleasant when you have peace and quiet. Managing is not one of them. Managing is harder and less pleasant. But if the role of a manager is to remove obstacles from the path of their employee, to recognize when they stray from the path, and to help them recover, then you need to figure out how to do that. It takes a lot less face-to-face interaction than most managers are willing to admit. If I were young and had discovered the joys of working remotely, you wouldn't get me into the office without a recession. In a hot job market? Watch me get a raise by jumping ship.
You want people to come into the office? Try paying them enough to make it worth their time and trouble. Just an idea.
Or you could settle for second and third rate people who can't get a better job because they need constant supervision. Sounds like win/win to me.