Droid
kglesq's Brother
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2010
- Posts
- 1,486
- Reaction score
- 757
I'm curious if anyone else has seen this, and if I'm not imagining it, than why is this the case? Sound through Bluetooth or Line-in seems to sound "better" than when playing off a USB hard drive.
I'm not an audiophile, but the music seems richer through Bluetooth or the Line-in, as though it has more dynamic range.
This is exactly the opposite of what I'd expect, given that in the case of the USB drive, the audio remains as a digital signal until output. With the line-in, it's being converted to analog stereo by a phone. With Bluetooth, it's effectively being transcoded into an additional lossy compression format (i.e. re-encoding an MP3 a second time), adding a second layer of digital compression to it.
My only theories are (in order of likelihood):
1.) I'm insane.
2.) The DAC in the stock radio is crap. (Although I'd think it'd be used for Bluetooth as well, perhaps it's a different system).
This is on a 2011 with Nav.
I'm not an audiophile, but the music seems richer through Bluetooth or the Line-in, as though it has more dynamic range.
This is exactly the opposite of what I'd expect, given that in the case of the USB drive, the audio remains as a digital signal until output. With the line-in, it's being converted to analog stereo by a phone. With Bluetooth, it's effectively being transcoded into an additional lossy compression format (i.e. re-encoding an MP3 a second time), adding a second layer of digital compression to it.
My only theories are (in order of likelihood):
1.) I'm insane.
2.) The DAC in the stock radio is crap. (Although I'd think it'd be used for Bluetooth as well, perhaps it's a different system).
This is on a 2011 with Nav.