reaper1441
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
- Posts
- 350
- Reaction score
- 207
you carry 55 gallon drums with you on trips? that is dedication, my friend!
The $300 sensor is the cheapest part of your equation. Messing with the computer to get it to accept the signal from said sensor, then ensuring that it will work with the Ford PCM in the way that you describe is where your cost (and risk) begins to skyrocket.
The rough estimate, any time that I've messed with e85 on go-fast stuff that is forced induction is closer to building fueling to support 2x the volume vs an additional 30%.
while your solution might work for pounding pavement or being within fill up distance at an e85 pump, or being able to carry enough e85 go make it back to a pump in gas cans, it would definitely NOT work for the places that I head with my truck.
I'm also not really certain of how much benefit you'd glean from all this work to just switch to e85.
it makes some sense for a race vehicle with support in place, but not really for being in the middle of nowhere, rolling solo or with a buddy.
To each their own, i guess.
Are you people not reading all of my post? Running an eca doesn't require any kind of support vehicle. You can run any combination of fuel at any time unlike a race gas tune. It's more convenient in remote areas than ****, or a race gas tune. Also the ecoboost on e85 will hit the limit of the stock turbos before knocking and can make substantially more powet than **** injection can. It will also run substantially cooler.
And it's not much work. It's 2 fuel line connections and one wire. I've litterally done it to hundreds of vehicles that have to switch fuels constantly with unknown level of ethanol all across the country. It AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTS BOOST AND TIMING TO ALL ETHANOL LEVELS OF WHATEVER YOU pour into the tank. Runs cooler and has the ability to make more power than the stock engine can handle.
---------- Post added at 06:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:21 PM ----------
you carry 55 gallon drums with you on trips? that is dedication, my friend!
The $300 sensor is the cheapest part of your equation. Messing with the computer to get it to accept the signal from said sensor, then ensuring that it will work with the Ford PCM in the way that you describe is where your cost (and risk) begins to skyrocket.
The rough estimate, any time that I've messed with e85 on go-fast stuff that is forced induction is closer to building fueling to support 2x the volume vs an additional 30%.
while your solution might work for pounding pavement or being within fill up distance at an e85 pump, or being able to carry enough e85 go make it back to a pump in gas cans, it would definitely NOT work for the places that I head with my truck.
I'm also not really certain of how much benefit you'd glean from all this work to just switch to e85.
it makes some sense for a race vehicle with support in place, but not really for being in the middle of nowhere, rolling solo or with a buddy.
To each their own, i guess.
Are you people not reading all of my post? Running an eca doesn't require any kind of support vehicle. You can run any combination of fuel at any time unlike a race gas tune. It's more convenient in remote areas than ****, or a race gas tune. Also the ecoboost on e85 will hit the limit of the stock turbos before knocking and can make substantially more powet than **** injection can. It will also run substantially cooler.
And it's not much work. It's 2 fuel line connections and one wire. I've litterally done it to hundreds of vehicles that have to switch fuels constantly with unknown level of ethanol all across the country. It AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTS BOOST AND TIMING TO ALL ETHANOL LEVELS OF WHATEVER YOU pour into the tank. Runs cooler and has the ability to make more power than the stock engine can handle. Also this has already been done to thousands of ford ecms. The raptor forum is just laughably behind the times as far as technology goes.