Jhollowell
Full Access Member
Hear me out. The gen 1 shock bodies are steel which accounts for the horrible corrosion and I'm guessing they hold heat a lot better than the gen 2 aluminum shocks (heat=bad). The gen 2 shocks are an aluminum body and bigger diameter and thinner wall tube and have much less corrosion and the shocks seem to hold up better (less heat buildup). Now, I'm not an engineer, however i work with a lot of smart aerospace engineers so I'm going to enlist their help to get some actual numbers but I'm wondering what it would take to make a Gen 1 aluminum shock body.
Facts:
Gen 1 body - Steel, 2.5"OD, *** wall, Threaded ends
Gen 1 bypass tube - compressed between upper cap and lower eyelet. No valves between shaft and IFP
Gen 2 body - Al, 3.0"OD, *** wall, NOT threaded.
Gen 2 bypass tube - Threaded into upper cap and lower eyelet, valve stack between shaft and IFP
Assumptions:
Sizing load cases: pressure, fatigue
In order to make an Al Gen 1 shock the ID of the tube will need to be the same and have the same threads so the top and bottom caps thread in as well as keeping the same fluid volume, so the only thing i can change is the OD. Obviously you can't just change materials but I'm curious how much larger OD I'd have to use in order to keep similar strength. It should be fairly easy to get the max pressure and calculate stresses, but the threaded ends may present a problem. I'm wondering if they chose steel because of the threads and the fatigue issue it causes or did they just over build it because it was the first one. Also, the Gen 2 is quite a bit lighter so maybe the pressures and forces are less? Anyone have any thoughts on this? Dumb idea that doesn't have any advantage? Guesses as to why the gen 2 went to a non threaded Al body? I know from experience when you do a second version of anything you can fix/improve a lot of things from the original so i'm wondering if the gen 2 shocks are just an improved design or if they are redesigned for a completely different truck? Curious to hear your thoughts.
Facts:
Gen 1 body - Steel, 2.5"OD, *** wall, Threaded ends
Gen 1 bypass tube - compressed between upper cap and lower eyelet. No valves between shaft and IFP
Gen 2 body - Al, 3.0"OD, *** wall, NOT threaded.
Gen 2 bypass tube - Threaded into upper cap and lower eyelet, valve stack between shaft and IFP
Assumptions:
Sizing load cases: pressure, fatigue
In order to make an Al Gen 1 shock the ID of the tube will need to be the same and have the same threads so the top and bottom caps thread in as well as keeping the same fluid volume, so the only thing i can change is the OD. Obviously you can't just change materials but I'm curious how much larger OD I'd have to use in order to keep similar strength. It should be fairly easy to get the max pressure and calculate stresses, but the threaded ends may present a problem. I'm wondering if they chose steel because of the threads and the fatigue issue it causes or did they just over build it because it was the first one. Also, the Gen 2 is quite a bit lighter so maybe the pressures and forces are less? Anyone have any thoughts on this? Dumb idea that doesn't have any advantage? Guesses as to why the gen 2 went to a non threaded Al body? I know from experience when you do a second version of anything you can fix/improve a lot of things from the original so i'm wondering if the gen 2 shocks are just an improved design or if they are redesigned for a completely different truck? Curious to hear your thoughts.