Nope, I didn't lose the argument about the commonality of the FWD V8 at all... I just think that you have an extraordinarily loose definition of the term "extremely uncommon", is all. Are GenI Raptors "extremely uncommon"? I don't think they are... I see them quite frequently. For the record, I am showing the following production information:
So if you're going to call the Cadillac DTS (just one example of a FWD V8, mind you) "extremely uncommon", then, at roughly 37% of the total production, you're also going to need to call GenI Raptors "extremely super-duper uncommon". Which is ********. I see several of them on the road per week, and I'll bet you do, too.
- Total GenI Raptor production: 77,453 (http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f5/list-raptor-production-numbers-svt-46850/)
- Total Cadillac DTS production (only one example of a FWD V8): 211,518 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadillac_DTS#Yearly_American_sales)
Let me help you understand what "extremely uncommon" really means in the world of cars (I'm even being generous with most of these):
- 1987 Buick GNX - 547
- 1989 Turbo Trans Am - 1550
- 2009-2010 Pontiac Solstice Coupe - 1266
- 1991 GMC Syclone - 2995
Hell, I wouldn't even consider the 2nd gen ('99-'04) Lightning (total production 28,124) to be "extremely uncommon". Uncommon, certainly... but extremely uncommon? Hardly. Even the 1993 Mustang Cobra at a total production (for the street version) of 4993 doesn't merit the "extremely uncommon" label, IMO.
Evidently, I'm not the only one with this position; in regard to the 1990-1993 Chevrolet 454 SS trucks:
(Hooniverse Obscure Muscle Car Garage – The 1990-93 Chevrolet Silverado 454 SSÂ*|Â*Hooniverse)
Sorry, bro... you made an ignorant statement, got called and fact checked, and tried to worm your way out of it. You failed. Be a man and admit that you're wrong... it's not that difficult.
Listen, I know it feels like I am your enemy because I continue to hurt your feelings and embarrass you. I assure you that I am just trying to help. Let me try now one more time. What you are trying to do now is called a logical fallacy. In a previous post, I proved mathematically that FWD V8s are statistically insignificant. This clearly meets the definition of extremely rare, at least here in the real world, on planet earth, where the rest of us live. Demonstrating that other cars are more rare does not mean that FWD V8s are not rare. That is your current failure. Specifically, you need to understand that two things can both be extremely rare even if one is more rare than the other. This is because the two conditions are not mutually exclusive. These are basic logical concepts that any 101 level course would cover. Please educate yourself.