I had a ‘98 ranger that went 178k miles w/o issue until my friend totaled it, then had an ‘89 Ranger that went 280k miles on the original clutch!! Brake lines blew on me so I took it the junk yard lol, used it as a beater for a couple seasons during winter/bad weather when I was trying to keep my GTO in good shape.
Did you tow? Did you take them off road? That's where I've seen things fall apart. Literally. Commuting? I would expect zero issues.
My sister got 140k from a Mustang II. Without issue. I think it was a '74. It had all of the Cali smog pump BS on it. She did the minimum maintenance. Incredible. It was a rattletrap. It just kept going and going and going. What's really important is the average when you're looking at a purchase. Even models which are among the best in average reliability sometimes are lemons. Sometimes the worst will run forever. It's like going to a casino. Can you win a bad bet? Sure. Can you lose a great bet? Sure. That's why I go in with the idea of cutting my losses if it looks like I might have a lemon. That's why I at least think about reliability when I buy, although my needs and wants often push me in a sub-optimal direction. If the US version of the Ranger has demonstrated good reliability by 2030 or so, it might be a contender for me. It's a nice size. And Ford likely designed it for taller people without ruining it for everyone else the way Toyota did.