Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
RAM TRX - TRX-Forum.com
Bronco Raptor - BroncoRaptorForum.com
Forums
GEN 1 (2010-2014) Ford SVT Raptor Forums
Ford Raptor Engine Discussion and Performance Mods
Procharger Stage II vs HO Intercooler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BoostedToy" data-source="post: 1737242" data-attributes="member: 31712"><p>In theory, the centrifugal should be easier on the engine than a PD supercharger. PD superchargers by nature create higher cylinder pressures at lower engine speeds, which is where the loading is harsher on your bottom-end. There are ways that centrifugals can improve lower engine speed performance (orifice plates and pulleying to increase the boost at lower and mid rpm and sizing the plate to restrict to a specific intake airflow. Ex) pulleying for 15 psi but restricting airflow to produce a max of 8 psi, which may be reached and carried from 4000rpm on, versus with a normal 8psi pulley combination and reaching 8psi at 6500 rpm, but only making 3 psi at 4000 rpm). </p><p></p><p>The issue seems to be tuning related on the centrifugals, with the limiting factors being the PCM Ford has on these trucks. Having tuned turbos, centrifugals and PD setups in the past, PD’s are really easy to tune.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BoostedToy, post: 1737242, member: 31712"] In theory, the centrifugal should be easier on the engine than a PD supercharger. PD superchargers by nature create higher cylinder pressures at lower engine speeds, which is where the loading is harsher on your bottom-end. There are ways that centrifugals can improve lower engine speed performance (orifice plates and pulleying to increase the boost at lower and mid rpm and sizing the plate to restrict to a specific intake airflow. Ex) pulleying for 15 psi but restricting airflow to produce a max of 8 psi, which may be reached and carried from 4000rpm on, versus with a normal 8psi pulley combination and reaching 8psi at 6500 rpm, but only making 3 psi at 4000 rpm). The issue seems to be tuning related on the centrifugals, with the limiting factors being the PCM Ford has on these trucks. Having tuned turbos, centrifugals and PD setups in the past, PD’s are really easy to tune. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
j0eycantrell
ID_AZ
17raptorshadow
NACHOMASTER
JayB
shelteredraptor
DJ NeX
icecoldak
Blueraptor20192024
Ol Blu
jasonchin27
17baker
mad_defensive
fkim119
SSWIM
Raptor_NV
dvm
Dano182
US HWY 666
TXGold
JBTAC
Badboy4fun_wa
IamNomad
jp1seattle
BoostCreep
Fireman Dave
AngelMomma101
TAC71
Whoops
MZRaptor72
taquitos
elpechedepeche
nikhsub1
Digipax
ChaseSixTwo
pigdogg
DAVfoto
calvin_klein88
CruiserClass
oxford37
bigredaggie
Forum statistics
Threads
93,647
Posts
1,966,056
Members
56,950
Latest member
TurboShane97
Forums
GEN 1 (2010-2014) Ford SVT Raptor Forums
Ford Raptor Engine Discussion and Performance Mods
Procharger Stage II vs HO Intercooler
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top