False. Just asked my attorney buddy. You bought your truck, providing a loaner is simply a customer service deal. It has no impact on the statute.
does your “attorney buddy” practice in the field or something unrelated?
I know at least 2 states - MD and VA where this is true. It was central in my suit. So, now that you've accused me of spreading false information, read my post again: in relevant part...
under some, perhaps most or all, I’m not familiar with all 50
Many of the “lemon law” statutes were based on ‘model’ legislation, and put forward to various state legilature ‘legislative drafting bodies’. Each state and the Fed has these. They’re not legislators, they glorified archivists and librarians who collect and organize various bill language and when asked they pull it up, send to a legislator for them to “sign” and introduce as a bill. Sometimes it’s correct, sometimes it’s not, sometimes it’s way off the legislator’s central topic. I’ve seen state interactions with these teams, and they’re just as partisan. I once saw an office ask for language for state level firearm preemption and they got a gun control bill back, which the assemblyman -now a prominent figure with DHS, hailing from NJ, introduced allegedly without reading. He then made a big hullabaloo about the team who ‘drafts the bills’, wouldn’t accept responsibility for signing and introducing without reading it and then withdrew the bill.
So, if you were to read some of the lemon laws you would see a lot of common ‘phraseology’ or language in them.