Normal
I've been looking at a variety of tuning options. In Montana, I am limited to 91 Octane .. no 93 or e85. Ford also specifically restricts/warns about octane boosters using MMTFrom what I know about dyno-tuning, the ambient temp & humidity can have an impact on results as well as inconsistency of one dyno machine versus another so I think it is somewhat subjective to compare dyno results from different tuning options, especially the piggybacks like Hammer (who told me their "auto-Oct" yields more conservative gains then a specific octance map), JB4 (which has no Gen 3 graphs), VRTuning, PulsarXT/Superchips, etcreading thru the JB4 support forum, I found Post# 823 & 824 which I think are insightful on one benefit of the JB4. https://www.jb4tech.com/forum/model-specific-engine-tuning-modification-discussion/ford-f150-raptor-and-ecoboost/20162-/page17still undecided
I've been looking at a variety of tuning options. In Montana, I am limited to 91 Octane .. no 93 or e85. Ford also specifically restricts/warns about octane boosters using MMT
From what I know about dyno-tuning, the ambient temp & humidity can have an impact on results as well as inconsistency of one dyno machine versus another so I think it is somewhat subjective to compare dyno results from different tuning options, especially the piggybacks like Hammer (who told me their "auto-Oct" yields more conservative gains then a specific octance map), JB4 (which has no Gen 3 graphs), VRTuning, PulsarXT/Superchips, etc
reading thru the JB4 support forum, I found Post# 823 & 824 which I think are insightful on one benefit of the JB4. https://www.jb4tech.com/forum/model-specific-engine-tuning-modification-discussion/ford-f150-raptor-and-ecoboost/20162-/page17
still undecided
