Conejoracer
Full Access Member
Hi,
I need some feedback on a problem that has developed with a fellow FRF member. On April 24, I posted this ad in the classifieds;
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f29/2013-oem-bead-locks-new-23400/
On Monday, I received a Paypal payment of $1525 to pay for the wheels, shipping, and Paypal fees. The shipping was $252.69, the Paypal fees were $48.00, netting $1,224.31. I shipped the wheels the same day via FedEx to the member.
Today at 7:05am, I get a message that the member is not happy and that a wheel is damaged. At this point, I must say that I only inspected two of the wheels prior to shipping. He sent this photo of the damage;
We have agreed that the wheel was not damaged in shipping, the boxes were intact. We agreed that the wheel was not curbed, but we don't agree that it may have been caused by removing the OEM tire. I think this may be a result of removing the tire, but he disagrees. Either way, the damage is done. I ask him what options we have to right this, and I suggest the wheel might be touched up. He tells me the wheel is powder coated and is not repairable.
The next email, at 9:11am, contains a repair estimate for $155.34 of the PAINTED surface. I again tell him that it might be touched up with Ford Argent Silver, and that if he must have it professionally repaired that I would split the cost of said repair.
At 10:11am I received this email;
Mark,
You represented the wheels AS NEW, not needing touch up or repair
I expect at least the cost of repair let alone the hassles and delay
Shortly after I received this and with no further response from me, he filed a protest with Paypal for $400.00.
What the hell?
Am I totally off here in thinking this spiraled totally out of control in no time?
Yes, I missed the scratch on the wheel apparently. I did state the wheels were as new, but had been on a vehicle. The wheels were mounted on a new truck, driven a bit, and dismounted, and I stated that.
Should I do more to make this right?
I'm a bit offended at his language that suggests I should pay "at least" (implying more?) the cost of the repair, and that he has endured hassles and delay?
So fellow FRF members, what say ye?
I need some feedback on a problem that has developed with a fellow FRF member. On April 24, I posted this ad in the classifieds;
http://www.fordraptorforum.com/f29/2013-oem-bead-locks-new-23400/
On Monday, I received a Paypal payment of $1525 to pay for the wheels, shipping, and Paypal fees. The shipping was $252.69, the Paypal fees were $48.00, netting $1,224.31. I shipped the wheels the same day via FedEx to the member.
Today at 7:05am, I get a message that the member is not happy and that a wheel is damaged. At this point, I must say that I only inspected two of the wheels prior to shipping. He sent this photo of the damage;
We have agreed that the wheel was not damaged in shipping, the boxes were intact. We agreed that the wheel was not curbed, but we don't agree that it may have been caused by removing the OEM tire. I think this may be a result of removing the tire, but he disagrees. Either way, the damage is done. I ask him what options we have to right this, and I suggest the wheel might be touched up. He tells me the wheel is powder coated and is not repairable.
The next email, at 9:11am, contains a repair estimate for $155.34 of the PAINTED surface. I again tell him that it might be touched up with Ford Argent Silver, and that if he must have it professionally repaired that I would split the cost of said repair.
At 10:11am I received this email;
Mark,
You represented the wheels AS NEW, not needing touch up or repair
I expect at least the cost of repair let alone the hassles and delay
Shortly after I received this and with no further response from me, he filed a protest with Paypal for $400.00.
What the hell?
Am I totally off here in thinking this spiraled totally out of control in no time?
Yes, I missed the scratch on the wheel apparently. I did state the wheels were as new, but had been on a vehicle. The wheels were mounted on a new truck, driven a bit, and dismounted, and I stated that.
Should I do more to make this right?
I'm a bit offended at his language that suggests I should pay "at least" (implying more?) the cost of the repair, and that he has endured hassles and delay?
So fellow FRF members, what say ye?