37" BFG ATs

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Ramrodthrusterpuppy

Full Access Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Posts
269
Reaction score
133
Location
Ottawuh, Canaduh!
I've been running 37/12.50/17 BFG ATs on OEM beadlocks (mid perch) since last Fall, mild off-roading (no jumps), Winter driving....no rubbing issues at all. Personally, I firmly believe wheel offset is the key to rubbing or not with little to no other modifications. I'm not sure that a 0 or negative offset wheel wouldn't rub, but I may run small spacers (~1") with my beadlocks just to get a *little* more wider stance. I don't think I'll go back to my 35" Toyo M/Ts on ProComp wheels for the Summer....which sucks, 'cuz I just bought them last year! Lol!
 

BAJASVT

FRF Addict
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Posts
1,029
Reaction score
475
Location
SE Michigan
Thanks, Ramrod. I've heard enough... I'm ordering these.

Are you running the OEM wheels in stock configuration with the beauty ring or do you have the Ford Racing beadlock ring installed? This is an 8.5" wide wheel, but I feel a 9" width would more accurately describe the width when the Ford Racing beadlock is installed due to the tires outer bead technically being mounted outside the factory seat. I know a few members here have installed the Ford Racing beadlock ring on the OEM beautylock wheels; I'd be curious to know if anyone took a tire height measurment comparison between OEM beautylock and Ford Racing beadlock. Other members are measuring an actual ~36.3" diameter on these tires... I'm guessing the Ford Racing beadlock would fatten the tire slightly, but pull that ~36.3" down to about ~36.0", which is fine with me (less chance of rubbing).

Also, have you shopped around for spacers? What have you found? There's another thread floating around where someone found some hubcentric 6x135 spacers, but they're 1.5" thick. If you only run 1" spacers, I'm pretty sure you'll need to grind down your OEM wheel studs or replace them with shorter studs or they'll protrude through the 1" spacer to the mounting face for the wheel hub.

Please keep us updated.
 

vince7870

FRF Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Posts
697
Reaction score
447
Location
long island NY
with the 37's are you guys getting computer reprogrammed by ford to correct speed and shift points? is that even an option? is anyone changing gearing? is that necessary?
 

Hockster

My 45ft Bluewater Party
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2010
Posts
5,142
Reaction score
1,873
Location
Winchester, Va
Well, if you change to 37 tires you should change your axle ratio to 431 or so but they dont make that gear so best would be 456 to get close to the 410 gearing.
 

BAJASVT

FRF Addict
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Posts
1,029
Reaction score
475
Location
SE Michigan
Well, if you change to 37 tires you should change your axle ratio to 431 or so but they dont make that gear so best would be 456 to get close to the 410 gearing.

Agreed!

A lot of guys running older Ford trucks w/ the 4.6L or 5.4L are running 4.56 gears with 35" tires, but the 6.2L can get away with a 4.10 because of it's additional torque. Like Hockster said, even with a 6.2L and a 37" tire, something with a higher ratio than 4.10 would be ideal. For those with a 2010 and a 5.4L, I'd recommend 4.56 gears if you're running a 37" tire.
 

TheJoker

FRF Addict
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Posts
4,124
Reaction score
3,374
Location
N. E. Massachusetts
So what I think we agree on, is that the 6.2l could get by with the stock 4.10 gears with 35"-37(36.3)" tires. But, ideally you would be better off with 4.56 gears? Now who makes them and where is the best place to buy them? Also, I'm guessing that the front gears for the 2010-11 and the 2012+ would be different?
 
Top